These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23312543)

  • 1. Advantages of fitting contrast curves using logistic function: a technical note.
    Brüllmann DD; Sachs AM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Mar; 115(3):e60-3. PubMed ID: 23312543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast curves of five different intraoral X-ray sensors: a technical note.
    Brüllmann DD; Kempkes B; d'Hoedt B; Schulze R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jun; 115(6):e55-61. PubMed ID: 23706925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital radiography for detecting misfit between the tooth and restoration in metal-restored teeth.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; Vizzotto MB; Da Silveira PF; Silveira HE; Wenzel A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25311793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
    Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Precise image-receptor calibration and monitoring of beam quality with a step wedge.
    Couture RA; Hildebolt CF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 11803390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of photostimulable phosphor plate image artifacts in an oral and maxillofacial radiology department.
    Chiu HL; Lin SH; Chen CH; Wang WC; Chen JY; Chen YK; Lin LM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):749-56. PubMed ID: 18547836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental photostimulable phosphor radiography.
    Hildebolt CF; Couture RA; Whiting BR
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):273-97, vi. PubMed ID: 10740769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computed radiography: photostimulable phosphor image plate technology.
    Long BW
    Radiol Technol; 1989; 61(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 2587727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Storage phosphor plates: how durable are they as a digital dental radiographic system?
    Bedard A; Davis TD; Angelopoulos C
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 May; 5(2):57-69. PubMed ID: 15150634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
    Doyle P; Finney L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The DenOptix digital radiographic system.
    Menig JJ
    J Clin Orthod; 1999 Jul; 33(7):407-10. PubMed ID: 10535024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital radiographic imaging: is the dental practice ready?
    Parks ET
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Apr; 139(4):477-81. PubMed ID: 18385032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility of pixel values for two photostimulable phosphor plates in consecutive standardized scannings.
    Freitas P; Yaedú RY; Rubira-Bullen IR; Escarpinati M; Vieira MC; Schiabel H; Lauris JR
    Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 17119702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses.
    Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger Z; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
    Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 12649645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing the absorbed dose in analogue radiography of infant chest images by improving the image quality, using image processing techniques.
    Karimian A; Yazdani S; Askari MA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):176-9. PubMed ID: 21743073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Analysis of the automatic brightness controlling for x-ray imaging systems].
    Huang YL; Qu T; Lu KL; Pan ZZ
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 26(6):402-6. PubMed ID: 16104315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Digital radiology using the DIGORA registration technic].
    van der Stelt PF
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 9289753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.