253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23313209)
1. The impact of an antibiotic coating on the artificial urinary sphincter infection rate.
de Cógáin MR; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2013 Jul; 190(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 23313209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Antibiotic Coating of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AMS 800): Is it Worthwhile?
Hüsch T; Kretschmer A; Thomsen F; Kronlachner D; Kurosch M; Obaje A; Anding R; Pottek T; Rose A; Olianas R; Friedl A; Hübner W; Homberg R; Pfitzenmaier J; Grein U; Queissert F; Naumann CM; Schweiger J; Wotzka C; Nyarangi-Dix J; Hofmann T; Ulm K; Bauer RM; Haferkamp A;
Urology; 2017 May; 103():179-184. PubMed ID: 28093308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results.
Gousse AE; Madjar S; Lambert MM; Fishman IJ
J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1755-8. PubMed ID: 11586217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision rate after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for incontinence after radical prostatectomy: actuarial analysis.
Clemens JQ; Schuster TG; Konnak JW; McGuire EJ; Faerber GJ
J Urol; 2001 Oct; 166(4):1372-5. PubMed ID: 11547077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined inflatable penile prosthesis-artificial urinary sphincter implantation: no increased risk of adverse events compared to single or staged device implantation.
Segal RL; Cabrini MR; Harris ED; Mostwin JL; Bivalacqua TJ; Burnett AL
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2183-8. PubMed ID: 23831315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do clinical or urodynamic parameters predict artificial urinary sphincter outcome in post-radical prostatectomy incontinence?
Thiel DD; Young PR; Broderick GA; Heckman MG; Wehle MJ; Igel TC; Petrou SP
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):315-9. PubMed ID: 17320671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial urinary sphincter versus male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence--what do patients choose?
Kumar A; Litt ER; Ballert KN; Nitti VW
J Urol; 2009 Mar; 181(3):1231-5. PubMed ID: 19152937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: impact of prior collagen injection on cost and clinical outcome.
Gomes CM; Broderick GA; Sánchez-Ortiz RF; Preate D; Rovner ES; Wein AJ
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 10604321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Continence and quality of life assessment after artificial urinary sphincter implantation.
Gnessin E; Livne PM; Baniel J; Gillon G
Isr Med Assoc J; 2004 Oct; 6(10):592-4. PubMed ID: 15473584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does preoperative topical antimicrobial scrub reduce positive surgical site culture rates in men undergoing artificial urinary sphincter placement?
Magera JS; Inman BA; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1328-32; discussion 1332. PubMed ID: 17698144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term durability and functional outcomes among patients with artificial urinary sphincters: a 10-year retrospective review from the University of Michigan.
Kim SP; Sarmast Z; Daignault S; Faerber GJ; McGuire EJ; Latini JM
J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):1912-6. PubMed ID: 18353376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of life and continence assessment of the artificial urinary sphincter in men with minimum 3.5 years of followup.
Haab F; Trockman BA; Zimmern PE; Leach GE
J Urol; 1997 Aug; 158(2):435-9. PubMed ID: 9224318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Artificial sphincter in severe urinary incontinence: 9 years of experience].
Batista Miranda JE; Arañó Bertrán P; Errando Smet C
Arch Esp Urol; 2000 Jun; 53(5):409-16. PubMed ID: 10961004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Indiana experience with artificial urinary sphincters in children and young adults.
Herndon CD; Rink RC; Shaw MB; Simmons GR; Cain MP; Kaefer M; Casale AJ
J Urol; 2003 Feb; 169(2):650-4; discussion 654. PubMed ID: 12544336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Impact of Urethral Risk Factors on Transcorporeal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosion Rates and Device Survival.
Mock S; Dmochowski RR; Brown ET; Reynolds WS; Kaufman MR; Milam DF
J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1692-6. PubMed ID: 26141851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simultaneous augmentation cystoplasty is associated with earlier rather than increased artificial urinary sphincter infection.
Catto JW; Natarajan V; Tophill PR
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1237-41. PubMed ID: 15758760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perioperative Complications following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement.
Linder BJ; Piotrowski JT; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Rangel LJ; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2015 Sep; 194(3):716-20. PubMed ID: 25776908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial urinary sphincter for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a historical cohort from 2004 to 2015.
Santos AC; Rodrigues LO; Azevedo DC; Carvalho LM; Fernandes MR; Avelar SO; Horta MG; Kelles SM
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(1):150-154. PubMed ID: 28124538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complex artificial urinary sphincter revision and reimplantation cases--how do they fare compared to virgin cases?
Lai HH; Boone TB
J Urol; 2012 Mar; 187(3):951-5. PubMed ID: 22264456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Complications due to lack of knowledge of the urinary sphincter prosthesis].
de Vries AH; Noordzij MA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2013; 157(10):A5608. PubMed ID: 23464585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
