These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23313874)
1. Age-related differences in enhancement and suppression of neural activity underlying selective attention in matched young and old adults. Haring AE; Zhuravleva TY; Alperin BR; Rentz DM; Holcomb PJ; Daffner KR Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 1499():69-79. PubMed ID: 23313874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does modulation of selective attention to features reflect enhancement or suppression of neural activity? Daffner KR; Zhuravleva TY; Sun X; Tarbi EC; Haring AE; Rentz DM; Holcomb PJ Biol Psychol; 2012 Feb; 89(2):398-407. PubMed ID: 22178708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The dissociation between early and late selection in older adults. Alperin BR; Haring AE; Zhuravleva TY; Holcomb PJ; Rentz DM; Daffner KR J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Dec; 25(12):2189-206. PubMed ID: 23915054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of executive capacity and age on mechanisms underlying multidimensional feature selection. Mott KK; Alperin BR; Fox AM; Holcomb PJ; Daffner KR Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():30-42. PubMed ID: 25660207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Age-related decline in bottom-up processing and selective attention in the very old. Zhuravleva TY; Alperin BR; Haring AE; Rentz DM; Holcomb PJ; Daffner KR J Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Jun; 31(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 24887611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Top-down enhancement and suppression of the magnitude and speed of neural activity. Gazzaley A; Cooney JW; McEvoy K; Knight RT; D'Esposito M J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Mar; 17(3):507-17. PubMed ID: 15814009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Age-related differences in the automatic processing of single letters: implications for selective attention. Daffner KR; Alperin BR; Mott KK; Holcomb PJ Neuroreport; 2014 Jan; 25(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 24162742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms. van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive knowledge of stimulus relevance does not influence top-down suppression of irrelevant information in older adults. Zanto TP; Hennigan K; Ostberg M; Clapp WC; Gazzaley A Cortex; 2010 Apr; 46(4):564-74. PubMed ID: 19744649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of endogenous event-related potentials in attend and non-attend conditions: latency changes with normal aging. Squires NK; Ollo C Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Mar; 110(3):564-74. PubMed ID: 10363780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of the short-term learned significance of task-irrelevant sounds on involuntary attention in children and adults. Wetzel N Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Oct; 98(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 26093029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrophysiological correlates of selective attention: a lifespan comparison. Mueller V; Brehmer Y; von Oertzen T; Li SC; Lindenberger U BMC Neurosci; 2008 Jan; 9():18. PubMed ID: 18237433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Age differences in the neural correlates underlying control of emotional memory: An event-related potential study. Gallant SN; Pun C; Yang L Brain Res; 2018 Oct; 1697():83-92. PubMed ID: 29920247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Compensatory neural activity distinguishes different patterns of normal cognitive aging. Riis JL; Chong H; Ryan KK; Wolk DA; Rentz DM; Holcomb PJ; Daffner KR Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):441-54. PubMed ID: 17931892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The active inhibition for the processing of visual irrelevant conflict information. Mao W; Wang Y Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Jan; 67(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 17999937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Processing of Attended and Predicted Sounds in Time. Paris T; Kim J; Davis C J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 28(1):158-65. PubMed ID: 26439266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Now you feel it, now you don't: Motivated attention to emotional content is modulated by age and task demands. Pehlivanoglu D; Verhaeghen P Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 19(5):1299-1316. PubMed ID: 31367982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Expectancy-related modulations of neural oscillations in continuous performance tasks. Bickel S; Dias EC; Epstein ML; Javitt DC Neuroimage; 2012 Sep; 62(3):1867-76. PubMed ID: 22691613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task. Potts GF; Wood SM; Kothmann D; Martin LE Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1236():126-39. PubMed ID: 18723003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]