These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23314359)

  • 1. What can the drivers' own description from combined sources provide in an analysis of driver distraction and low vigilance in accident situations?
    Tivesten E; Wiberg H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Mar; 52():51-63. PubMed ID: 23314359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonresponse analysis and adjustment in a mail survey on car accidents.
    Tivesten E; Jonsson S; Jakobsson L; Norin H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Sep; 48():401-15. PubMed ID: 22664706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are child occupants a significant source of driving distraction?
    Koppel S; Charlton J; Kopinathan C; Taranto D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1236-44. PubMed ID: 21376923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring inattention and distraction in the SafetyNet Accident Causation Database.
    Talbot R; Fagerlind H; Morris A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Nov; 60():445-55. PubMed ID: 24176106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of distractions on the crash types of teenage drivers.
    Neyens DM; Boyle LN
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Jan; 39(1):206-12. PubMed ID: 16996017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Driver inattention and driver distraction in serious casualty crashes: data from the Australian National Crash In-depth Study.
    Beanland V; Fitzharris M; Young KL; Lenné MG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 May; 54():99-107. PubMed ID: 23499981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The result of a baseline survey on drink driving in Nanning and Liuzhou of Guangxi Province, China.
    Yuan A; Li Y; Zhang J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 23441940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Young drivers' optimism bias for accident risk and driving skill: Accountability and insight experience manipulations.
    White MJ; Cunningham LC; Titchener K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Jul; 43(4):1309-15. PubMed ID: 21545859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Truck drivers' opinion on road safety in Tanzania--a questionnaire study.
    Kircher K; Andersson J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 23259525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What factors influence drivers' response time for evasive maneuvers in real traffic?
    Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():299-308. PubMed ID: 22749317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of driver distraction on road safety: results from a representative survey in two Australian states.
    McEvoy SP; Stevenson MR; Woodward M
    Inj Prev; 2006 Aug; 12(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 16887946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Associating crash avoidance maneuvers with driver attributes and accident characteristics: a mixed logit model approach.
    Kaplan S; Prato CG
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(3):315-26. PubMed ID: 22607255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of self-report of on-road crashes and traffic offences in a cohort of young drivers: the DRIVE study.
    Boufous S; Ivers R; Senserrick T; Stevenson M; Norton R; Williamson A
    Inj Prev; 2010 Aug; 16(4):275-7. PubMed ID: 20423901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Progress in teenage crash risk during the last decade.
    Ferguson SA; Teoh ER; McCartt AT
    J Safety Res; 2007; 38(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 17478184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors correlated with traffic accidents as a basis for evaluating Advanced Driver Assistance Systems.
    Staubach M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 Sep; 41(5):1025-33. PubMed ID: 19664441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and evaluation of a driving observation schedule (DOS) to study everyday driving performance of older drivers.
    Vlahodimitrakou Z; Charlton JL; Langford J; Koppel S; Di Stefano M; Macdonald W; Mazer B; Gelinas I; Vrkljan B; Porter MM; Smith GA; Cull AW; Marshall S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Dec; 61():253-60. PubMed ID: 23639887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The risk of a safety-critical event associated with mobile device use in specific driving contexts.
    Fitch GM; Hanowski RJ; Guo F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 24896192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Driver hand-held cellular phone use: a four-year analysis.
    Eby DW; Vivoda JM; St Louis RM
    J Safety Res; 2006; 37(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 16815447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exposure data and risk indicators for safety performance assessment in Europe.
    Papadimitriou E; Yannis G; Bijleveld F; Cardoso JL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Nov; 60():371-83. PubMed ID: 23769621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Teen driver crash risk and associations with smoking and drowsy driving.
    Hutchens L; Senserrick TM; Jamieson PE; Romer D; Winston FK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 May; 40(3):869-76. PubMed ID: 18460353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.