260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23314479)
1. Agreement of IOL power and axial length obtained by IOLMaster 500 vs IOLMaster 500 with Sonolink connection.
Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Nantasri P; Chongchareon M; Chonpimai P
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Apr; 251(4):1145-9. PubMed ID: 23314479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard.
Kaswin G; Rousseau A; Mgarrech M; Barreau E; Labetoulle M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 24680520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraocular lens power calculation using the IOLMaster and various formulas in eyes with long axial length.
Wang JK; Hu CY; Chang SW
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 18242451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of Holladay 2 formula using IOLMaster parameters in the absence of lens thickness value.
Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chirapapaisan N; Lertsuwanroj B; Chongchareon M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 251(11):2563-7. PubMed ID: 23949638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agreement analysis of LENSTAR with other techniques of biometry.
Jasvinder S; Khang TF; Sarinder KK; Loo VP; Subrayan V
Eye (Lond); 2011 Jun; 25(6):717-24. PubMed ID: 21394115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 2 optical biometers and evaluation of the Camellin-Calossi intraocular lens formula for normal cataractous eyes.
Suto C; Shimamura E; Watanabe I
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2366-72. PubMed ID: 26703484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery.
Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 257(12):2677-2682. PubMed ID: 31486917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster.
Huang J; Savini G; Li J; Lu W; Wu F; Wang J; Li Y; Feng Y; Wang Q
Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 98(9):1277-81. PubMed ID: 24795336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of biometry and intraocular lens power calculation performed by a new optical biometry device and a reference biometer.
Ventura BV; Ventura MC; Wang L; Koch DD; Weikert MP
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28317681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Level of agreement of intraocular lens power measurements between an image-guided system and partial coherence interferometry.
Labiris G; Panagiotopoulou EK; Ntonti P; Gkika M; Konstantinidis A; Perente I; Dardabounis D; Ioannakis K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Apr; 46(4):573-580. PubMed ID: 32271524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using three optical biometry measurement devices: the OA-2000, Lenstar-LS900 and IOLMaster-500.
Reitblat O; Levy A; Kleinmann G; Assia EI
Eye (Lond); 2018 Jul; 32(7):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 29527012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer.
Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Koodkaew S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 24656166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Efficacy of the New Optical Biometer on Intraocular Lens Power Calculation (AL-Scan versus IOLMaster).
Ha A; Wee WR; Kim MK
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 32(3):241-248. PubMed ID: 29770644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of pupil dilation on biometry measurements with partial coherence interferometry and its effect on IOL power formula calculation.
Rodriguez-Raton A; Jimenez-Alvarez M; Arteche-Limousin L; Mediavilla-Peña E; Larrucea-Martinez I
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2015; 25(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25655597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer for IOL Power Calculation and Comparison to IOLMaster.
Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Aramberri J; Huang J; Barboni P
J Refract Surg; 2017 Oct; 33(10):690-695. PubMed ID: 28991337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.
Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas.
Reitblat O; Assia EI; Kleinmann G; Levy A; Barrett GD; Abulafia A
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015; 43(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 25491591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Agreement between IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL for IOL power measurement in patients with high myopia.
Budiman B; Knoch AMH; Boesoirie SF; Budiman NK; Irfani I; Sugiarti ED; Musa IR
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2024 Jul; 72(7):1021-1025. PubMed ID: 38905462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of axial length, anterior chamber depth and intraocular lens power between IOLMaster and ultrasound in normal, long and short eyes.
Dong J; Zhang Y; Zhang H; Jia Z; Zhang S; Wang X
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194273. PubMed ID: 29543854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of pharmacological pupil dilation on measurements and iol power calculation made using the new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.
Arriola-Villalobos P; Almendral-Gómez J; Garzón N; Ruiz-Medrano J; Fernández-Pérez C; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Díaz-Valle D
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2016 Dec; 39(10):859-865. PubMed ID: 27793471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
