148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23315892)
1. Making the transition to a learning health care system. Commentary.
Grady C; Wendler D
Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; Spec No():S32-3. PubMed ID: 23315892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A prescription for ethical learning. Commentary.
Largent EA; Miller FG; Joffe S
Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; Spec No():S28-9. PubMed ID: 23315890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Advances in the research enterprise. Commentary.
Kupersmith J
Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; Spec No():S43-4. PubMed ID: 23315897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The unbelievable rightness of being in clinical trials. Commentary.
Menikoff J
Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; Spec No():S30-1. PubMed ID: 23315891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reform within the common rule? Commentary.
Puglisi T
Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; Spec No():S40-2. PubMed ID: 23315896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethical oversight: serving the best interests of patients. Commentary.
Selby JV; Krumholz HM
Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; Spec No():S34-6. PubMed ID: 23315893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation as part of operations: reconciling the common rule and continuous improvement. Commentary.
Platt R; Grossmann C; Selker HP
Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; Spec No():S37-9. PubMed ID: 23315894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An ethics framework for a learning health care system: a departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics.
Faden RR; Kass NE; Goodman SN; Pronovost P; Tunis S; Beauchamp TL
Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; Spec No():S16-27. PubMed ID: 23315888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical oversight of research on patient care.
Solomon MZ; Bonham AC
Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; Spec No():S2-3. PubMed ID: 23315889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The research-treatment distinction: a problematic approach for determining which activities should have ethical oversight.
Kass NE; Faden RR; Goodman SN; Pronovost P; Tunis S; Beauchamp TL
Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; Spec No():S4-S15. PubMed ID: 23315895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Health researchers' ancillary care obligations in low-resource settings: how can we tell what is morally required?
Merritt MW
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2011 Dec; 21(4):311-47. PubMed ID: 22187929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vulnerability: a needed moral safeguard.
DeMarco JP
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):82-4; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The gambler's fallacy, the therapeutic misconception, and unrealistic optimism.
Swekoski D; Barnbaum D
IRB; 2013; 35(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 23672144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Who is a patient and why does it matter?
Iltis AS
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):62-4. PubMed ID: 21534158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The two-patient framework for research during pregnancy: a critique and a better way forward.
Liaschenko J; DeBruin D; Marshall MF
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):66-8. PubMed ID: 21534160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring the ethics and psychological impact of deception in psychological research.
Boynton MH; Portnoy DB; Johnson BT
IRB; 2013; 35(2):7-13. PubMed ID: 23672145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the case for the regulation of research.
Wilkinson T
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):63-5. PubMed ID: 20694915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Time to stop worrying about the therapeutic misconception.
Wendler DS
J Clin Ethics; 2012; 23(3):272-87. PubMed ID: 23256408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The fetus as a patient and the ethics of human subjects research: response to commentaries on "An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients".
McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):W3-7. PubMed ID: 21534136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Unacceptable risk in pregnancy: whose choice and responsibility?
Perry C
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):64-5. PubMed ID: 21534159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
