These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23316493)
41. Risk-sensitive allocation in seasonal dynamics of fat and protein reserves in a long-lived mammal. Monteith KL; Stephenson TR; Bleich VC; Conner MM; Pierce BM; Bowyer RT J Anim Ecol; 2013 Mar; 82(2):377-88. PubMed ID: 23379674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effect of current reproduction on apparent survival, breeding dispersal, and future reproduction in barn swallows assessed by multistate capture-recapture models. Schaub M; von Hirschheydt J J Anim Ecol; 2009 May; 78(3):625-35. PubMed ID: 19040683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Inter-specific synchrony of two contrasting ungulates: wild boar (Sus scrofa) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Mysterud A; Tryjanowski P; Panek M; Pettorelli N; Stenseth NC Oecologia; 2007 Mar; 151(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 17102995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Morphological and molecular characterization of four Sarcocystis spp., including Sarcocystis linearis n. sp., from roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Italy. Gjerde B; Giacomelli S; Bianchi A; Bertoletti I; Mondani H; Gibelli LR Parasitol Res; 2017 Apr; 116(4):1317-1338. PubMed ID: 28255918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Reproductive effort and success of males in scramble-competition polygyny: Evidence for trade-offs between foraging and mate search. Foley AM; Hewitt DG; DeYoung RW; Schnupp MJ; Hellickson MW; Lockwood MA J Anim Ecol; 2018 Nov; 87(6):1600-1614. PubMed ID: 30079548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Individual quality and age but not environmental or social conditions modulate costs of reproduction in a capital breeder. Debeffe L; Poissant J; McLoughlin PD Ecol Evol; 2017 Aug; 7(15):5580-5591. PubMed ID: 28811876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A one night stand? Reproductive excursions of female roe deer as a breeding dispersal tactic. Debeffe L; Focardi S; Bonenfant C; Hewison AJ; Morellet N; Vanpé C; Heurich M; Kjellander P; Linnell JD; Mysterud A; Pellerin M; Sustr P; Urbano F; Cagnacci F Oecologia; 2014 Oct; 176(2):431-43. PubMed ID: 25027183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Static and dynamic expression of life history traits in the Northern Fulmar ( Orzack SH; Steiner UK; Tuljapurkar S; Thompson P Oikos; 2011 Mar; 120(3):369-380. PubMed ID: 29093607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Social rank and reproductive performance of pampas deer females (Ozotoceros bezoarticus, Linnaeus, 1758). Morales-Piñeyrúa JT; Ciappesoni G; Ungerfeld R Behav Processes; 2014 Jun; 105():49-52. PubMed ID: 24631833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Captive roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) select for low amounts of tannic acid but not quebracho: fluctuation of preferences and potential benefits. Clauss M; Lason K; Gehrke J; Lechner-Doll M; Fickel J; Grune T; Jürgen Streich W Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol; 2003 Oct; 136(2):369-82. PubMed ID: 14529762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Access to mates in a territorial ungulate is determined by the size of a male's territory, but not by its habitat quality. Vanpé C; Morellet N; Kjellander P; Goulard M; Liberg O; Hewison AJ J Anim Ecol; 2009 Jan; 78(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 18752539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. How does climate change influence demographic processes of widespread species? Lessons from the comparative analysis of contrasted populations of roe deer. Gaillard JM; Hewison AJ; Klein F; Plard F; Douhard M; Davison R; Bonenfant C Ecol Lett; 2013 May; 16 Suppl 1():48-57. PubMed ID: 23297773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Inter- and intrasexual variation in aging patterns across reproductive traits in a wild red deer population. Nussey DH; Kruuk LE; Morris A; Clements MN; Pemberton JM; Clutton-Brock TH Am Nat; 2009 Sep; 174(3):342-57. PubMed ID: 19653847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The rate of senescence in maternal performance increases with early-life fecundity in red deer. Nussey DH; Kruuk LE; Donald A; Fowlie M; Clutton-Brock TH Ecol Lett; 2006 Dec; 9(12):1342-50. PubMed ID: 17118008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Immunogenetic heterogeneity in a widespread ungulate: the European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Quéméré E; Galan M; Cosson JF; Klein F; Aulagnier S; Gilot-Fromont E; Merlet J; Bonhomme M; Hewison AJ; Charbonnel N Mol Ecol; 2015 Aug; 24(15):3873-87. PubMed ID: 26120040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Morphological defects of epididymal spermatozoa in male roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) during the reproductive season. Kozioł K; Koziorowski M Pol J Vet Sci; 2015; 18(3):565-72. PubMed ID: 26618589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Genetic and behavioural estimates of reproductive skew in male fallow deer. Say L; Naulty F; Hayden TJ Mol Ecol; 2003 Oct; 12(10):2793-800. PubMed ID: 12969481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. From gestation to weaning: Combining robust design and multi-event models unveils cost of lactation in a large herbivore. Richard Q; Toïgo C; Appolinaire J; Loison A; Garel M J Anim Ecol; 2017 Oct; 86(6):1497-1509. PubMed ID: 28772345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. An evolutionary perspective on reproductive individual heterogeneity in a marine vertebrate. Chambert T; Rotella JJ; Garrott RA J Anim Ecol; 2014 Sep; 83(5):1158-68. PubMed ID: 24673453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Roles of human disturbance, precipitation, and a pathogen on the survival and reproductive probabilities of deer mice. Previtali MA; Lehmer EM; Pearce-Duvet JM; Jones JD; Clay CA; Wood BA; Ely PW; Laverty SM; Dearing MD Ecology; 2010 Feb; 91(2):582-92. PubMed ID: 20392022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]