These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23316975)

  • 1. Outcome value influences attentional biases in human associative learning: dissociable effects of training and instruction.
    Le Pelley ME; Mitchell CJ; Johnson AM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jan; 39(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 23316975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overt attention and predictiveness in human contingency learning.
    Le Pelley ME; Beesley T; Griffiths O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 21319915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcome predictability biases learning.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ; Bethmont A; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 25706542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of blocking on overt attention and associability in human learning.
    Beesley T; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 20718547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional mechanisms in learned predictiveness.
    Mitchell CJ; Griffiths O; Seetoo J; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Apr; 38(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 22369199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The blocking effect in associative learning involves learned biases in rapid attentional capture.
    Luque D; Vadillo MA; Gutiérrez-Cobo MJ; Le Pelley ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):522-544. PubMed ID: 27874321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative salience versus relative validity: cue salience influences blocking in human associative learning.
    Le Pelley ME; Beesley T; Griffiths O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):116-32. PubMed ID: 24099508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction and uncertainty in associative learning: examining controlled and automatic components of learned attentional biases.
    Luque D; Vadillo MA; Le Pelley ME; Beesley T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1485-1503. PubMed ID: 27174735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automaticity and cognitive control in the learned predictiveness effect.
    Shone LT; Harris IM; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):18-31. PubMed ID: 25706543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resistance to instructed reversal of the learned predictiveness effect.
    Don HJ; Livesey EJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(7):1327-47. PubMed ID: 25383751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learned predictiveness influences automatic evaluations in human contingency learning.
    Le Pelley ME; Calvini G; Spears R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 22943510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional instructions modulate differential context-switch effects after short and long training in human predictive learning.
    Callejas-Aguilera JE; Cubillas CP; Rosas JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(4):474-484. PubMed ID: 31081658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating cue competition in contextual cuing of visual search.
    Beesley T; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):709-25. PubMed ID: 21895393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learned predictiveness effects in humans: a function of learning, performance, or both?
    Le Pelley ME; Suret MB; Beesley T
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):312-27. PubMed ID: 19594278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing probability matching and episodic retrieval accounts of response repetition effects in task switching.
    Altmann EM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):935-51. PubMed ID: 21728467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing learned predictiveness effects within and across compound discriminations.
    Livesey EJ; Thorwart A; De Fina NL; Harris JA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):446-65. PubMed ID: 21517197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The experimental task influences cue competition in human causal learning.
    Melchers KG; Ungör M; Lachnit H
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 16248733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contingency bias in probability judgement may arise from ambiguity regarding additional causes.
    Mitchell CJ; Griffiths O; More P; Lovibond PF
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1675-86. PubMed ID: 23350876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contextual cues aid recovery from interruption: the role of associative activation.
    Hodgetts HM; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1120-32. PubMed ID: 16938050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.