These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23316977)

  • 1. Categorization of photographic images by rats using shape-based image dimensions.
    Brooks DI; Ng KH; Buss EW; Marshall AT; Freeman JH; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jan; 39(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 23316977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of stimulus manipulations on visual categorization in pigeons.
    Lazareva OF; Freiburger KL; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):224-33. PubMed ID: 16616817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scene gist categorization by pigeons.
    Kirkpatrick K; Bilton T; Hansen BC; Loschky LC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Apr; 40(2):162-77. PubMed ID: 24364667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Same-different categorization in rats.
    Wasserman EA; Castro L; Freeman JH
    Learn Mem; 2012 Mar; 19(4):142-5. PubMed ID: 22408237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of the hippocampus in object discrimination based on visual features.
    Levcik D; Nekovarova T; Antosova E; Stuchlik A; Klement D
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2018 Nov; 155():127-135. PubMed ID: 29886092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dorsal hippocampus is necessary for visual categorization in rats.
    Kim J; Castro L; Wasserman EA; Freeman JH
    Hippocampus; 2018 Jun; 28(6):392-405. PubMed ID: 29473984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Categorization of visual stimuli in the honeybee Apis mellifera.
    Benard J; Stach S; Giurfa M
    Anim Cogn; 2006 Oct; 9(4):257-70. PubMed ID: 16909238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Wills AJ; Lea SE; Leaver LA; Osthaus B; Ryan CM; Suret MB; Bryant CM; Chapman SJ; Millar L
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 19929108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Object/picture recognition in hens.
    Railton R; Foster TM; Temple W
    Behav Processes; 2014 May; 104():53-64. PubMed ID: 24502969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects.
    Cooke T; Jäkel F; Wallraven C; Bülthoff HH
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):484-95. PubMed ID: 16580027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential impact of posterior lesions in the left and right hemisphere on visual category learning and generalization to contrast reversal.
    Langguth B; Jüttner M; Landis T; Regard M; Rentschler I
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2927-36. PubMed ID: 19573546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of visual cortex lesions on perceptual grouping in rats.
    Kurylo DD
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 190(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 18395275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term memory for categories and concepts in horses (Equus caballus).
    Hanggi EB; Ingersoll JF
    Anim Cogn; 2009 May; 12(3):451-62. PubMed ID: 19148689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Velocity-based motion categorization by pigeons.
    Cook RG; Beale K; Koban A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 21517199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Logical rules and the classification of integral-dimension stimuli.
    Little DR; Nosofsky RM; Donkin C; Denton SE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):801-20. PubMed ID: 22905932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brief communication: the role of category structure in determining the effects of stimulus preexposure on categorization accuracy.
    Wills AJ; Suret M; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 14690850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Picture-object recognition in pigeons: evidence of representational insight in a visual categorization task using a complementary information procedure.
    Aust U; Huber L
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Apr; 32(2):190-5. PubMed ID: 16634663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial choices of rats based on abstract visual information: Pattern- or configuration-discrimination?
    Nekovarova T; Nedvidek J; Bures J
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 172(2):264-71. PubMed ID: 16806518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial choices of macaque monkeys based on the visual representation of the response space: rotation of the stimuli.
    Nedvidek J; Nekovarova T; Bures J
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 193(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 18588916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rats' memory for event duration in delayed matching-to-sample with nonspatial comparison response alternatives.
    Van Rooyen P; McMillan N; Santi A
    Behav Processes; 2008 May; 78(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18222613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.