155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23317032)
1. Clinical utility and tolerability of JSPH-1 wireless esophageal pH monitoring system.
Li JN; Liu CL; Tao XH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 13():10. PubMed ID: 23317032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of prolonged 48-h wireless capsule esophageal pH monitoring on diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and evaluation of the relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes.
Domingues GR; Moraes-Filho JP; Domingues AG
Arq Gastroenterol; 2011; 48(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 21537538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wireless esophageal pH capsule for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a multicenter clinical study.
Yang XJ; Gan T; Wang L; Liao Z; Tao XH; Shen W; Zhao XY
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 20(40):14865-74. PubMed ID: 25356046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term wireless pH monitoring of the distal esophagus: prolonging the test beyond 48 hours is unnecessary and may be misleading.
Capovilla G; Salvador R; Spadotto L; Voltarel G; Pesenti E; Perazzolo A; Nicoletti L; Merigliano S; Costantini M
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Oct; 30(10):1-8. PubMed ID: 28859392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring.
Chander B; Hanley-Williams N; Deng Y; Sheth A
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 46(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 21959323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of two modes of gastroesophageal reflux measuring: conventional esophageal pH monitoring and wireless pH monitoring.
Azzam RS; Sallum RA; Brandão JF; Navarro-Rodriguez T; Nasi A
Arq Gastroenterol; 2012; 49(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 22766996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of measurement of esophageal acid exposure close to the gastroesophageal junction on diagnostic accuracy and event-symptom correlation: a prospective study using wireless dual pH monitoring.
Bansal A; Wani S; Rastogi A; Rastogi K; Goyal A; Hall S; Singh V; Higbee A; Sharma P
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Dec; 104(12):2918-25. PubMed ID: 19755975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wireless pH capsule--yield in clinical practice.
Roman S; Mion F; Zerbib F; Benamouzig R; Letard JC; Bruley des Varannes S
Endoscopy; 2012 Mar; 44(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 22275050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Day-to-day variability in acid reflux patterns using the BRAVO pH monitoring system.
Ahlawat SK; Novak DJ; Williams DC; Maher KA; Barton F; Benjamin SB
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2006 Jan; 40(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 16340628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interference with daily activities and major adverse events during esophageal pH monitoring with bravo wireless capsule versus conventional intranasal catheter: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Iluyomade A; Olowoyeye A; Fadahunsi O; Thomas L; Libend CN; Ragunathan K; Fenster J; Vignesh S
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Feb; 30(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 26952638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety and Efficacy of Wireless pH Monitoring in Patients Suspected of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review.
Kessels SJM; Newton SS; Morona JK; Merlin TL
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2017 Oct; 51(9):777-788. PubMed ID: 28877081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of esophageal acid exposure at 1 cm and 6 cm above the squamocolumnar junction using the Bravo pH monitoring system.
Pandolfino JE; Lee TJ; Schreiner MA; Zhang Q; Roth MP; Kahrilas PJ
Dis Esophagus; 2006; 19(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 16722995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subcardial 24-h wireless pH monitoring in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with and without hiatal hernia compared with healthy subjects.
Grigolon A; Cantú P; Bravi I; Caparello C; Penagini R
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Nov; 104(11):2714-20. PubMed ID: 19638965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic pH monitoring for patients with suspected or refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Turner BG; Saltzman JR; Hua L; Maurer R; Feldman N; Carr-Locke DL; Burakoff R; Liu JJ
Can J Gastroenterol; 2007 Nov; 21(11):737-41. PubMed ID: 18026578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wireless capsule pH monitoring: does it fulfil all expectations?
Maerten P; Ortner M; Michetti P; Dorta G
Digestion; 2007; 76(3-4):235-40. PubMed ID: 18174686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance, tolerability, and symptoms related to prolonged pH monitoring using the Bravo system in Mexico.
Remes-Troche JM; Ibarra-Palomino J; Carmona-Sánchez RI; Valdovinos MA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Nov; 100(11):2382-6. PubMed ID: 16279888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. To Bravo or not? A comparison of wireless esophageal pH monitoring and conventional pH catheter to evaluate non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease in a multiracial Asian cohort.
Ang D; Teo EK; Ang TL; Ong J; Poh CH; Tan J; Fock KM
J Dig Dis; 2010 Feb; 11(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 20132427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wireless pH recording immediately above the squamocolumnar junction improves the diagnostic performance of esophageal pH studies.
Wenner J; Hall M; Höglund P; Johansson J; Johnsson F; Oberg S
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Dec; 103(12):2977-85. PubMed ID: 18786112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical utility of the wireless pH capsule.
Lacy BE; Dukowicz AC; Robertson DJ; Weiss JE; Teixeira P; Kelley ML
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2011; 45(5):429-35. PubMed ID: 21030875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease-related noncardiac chest pain].
Zheng J; Du ZM; Chen MH; Lin JK; Hu PJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 May; 88(20):1390-3. PubMed ID: 18953876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
