222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23317141)
1. Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study.
Liu NH; Mazzoni A; Zamberlin N; Colomar M; Chang OH; Arnaud L; Althabe F; Belizán JM
Reprod Health; 2013 Jan; 10(1):2. PubMed ID: 23317141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Women's preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: a prospective cohort study.
Mazzoni A; Althabe F; Gutierrez L; Gibbons L; Liu NH; Bonotti AM; Izbizky GH; Ferrary M; Viergue N; Vigil SI; Zalazar Denett G; Belizán JM
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Feb; 16():34. PubMed ID: 26857448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in China: A mixed-methods systematic review.
Long Q; Kingdon C; Yang F; Renecle MD; Jahanfar S; Bohren MA; Betran AP
PLoS Med; 2018 Oct; 15(10):e1002672. PubMed ID: 30325928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How did you choose a mode of birth? Experiences of nulliparous women from Turkey.
Boz İ; Teskereci G; Akman G
Women Birth; 2016 Aug; 29(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 26846560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in Iran: a mixed-methods systematic review.
Shirzad M; Shakibazadeh E; Hajimiri K; Betran AP; Jahanfar S; Bohren MA; Opiyo N; Long Q; Kingdon C; Colomar M; Abedini M
Reprod Health; 2021 Jan; 18(1):3. PubMed ID: 33388072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Salient beliefs towards vaginal delivery in pregnant women: A qualitative study from Iran.
Rahnama P; Mohammadi K; Montazeri A
Reprod Health; 2016 Jan; 13():7. PubMed ID: 26801087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK
Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Women's perspectives on health facility and system levels factors influencing mode of delivery in Tehran: a qualitative study.
Shirzad M; Shakibazadeh E; Betran AP; Bohren MA; Abedini M
Reprod Health; 2019 Feb; 16(1):15. PubMed ID: 30736792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility of Conducting a Trial Assessing Benefits and Risks of Planned Caesarean Section Versus Planned Vaginal Birth: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Amyx MM; Althabe F; Rivo J; Pingray V; Minckas N; Belizán M; Gibbons L; Murga GT; Fiorillo ÁE; Malamud JD; Casale RA; Cormick G; Belizán JM;
Matern Child Health J; 2021 Jan; 25(1):136-150. PubMed ID: 33392930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sources of influence on pregnant women's preferred mode of delivery in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Amyx M; Gibbons L; Xiong X; Mazzoni A; Althabe F; Buekens P; Belizán JM
Birth; 2018 Mar; 45(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 28856723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Women's preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery - Comparing five sites in Norway.
Lindstad Løvåsmoen EM; Nyland Bjørgo M; Lukasse M; Schei B; Henriksen L
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2018 Jun; 16():206-212. PubMed ID: 29804768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors associated with Chinese nulliparous women's choices of mode of delivery: A longitudinal study.
Zhang Z; Gu C; Zhu X; Ding Y; Simone S; Wang X; Tao H
Midwifery; 2018 Jul; 62():42-48. PubMed ID: 29653417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rising caesarean section rates and factors affecting women's decision-making about mode of birth in Indonesia: a longitudinal qualitative study.
Zahroh RI; Hazfiarini A; Martiningtyas MA; Ekawati FM; Emilia O; Cheong M; Betran AP; Homer CS; Bohren MA
BMJ Glob Health; 2024 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 38897616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-medical factors affecting antenatal preferences for delivery route and actual delivery mode of women in southwestern Iran.
Rajabi A; Maharlouei N; Rezaianzadeh A; Rajaeefard A; Keshavarzi S; Lankarani KB; Gholami A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3622-8. PubMed ID: 26753876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A qualitative study of nulliparous women's decision making on mode of delivery under China's two-child policy.
Gu C; Zhu X; Ding Y; Setterberg Simone ; Wang X; Tao H; Zhang Y
Midwifery; 2018 Jul; 62():6-13. PubMed ID: 29626722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mode of delivery preferences in a diverse population of pregnant women.
Yee LM; Kaimal AJ; Houston KA; Wu E; Thiet MP; Nakagawa S; Caughey AB; Firouzian A; Kuppermann M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 212(3):377.e1-24. PubMed ID: 25446662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Large reductions in cesarean delivery rates in China: a qualitative study on delivery decision-making in the era of the two-child policy.
Wang E; Hesketh T
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Dec; 17(1):405. PubMed ID: 29202726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?
Angeja AC; Washington AE; Vargas JE; Gomez R; Rojas I; Caughey AB
BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1253-8. PubMed ID: 17014679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors associated with women's birth beliefs and experiences of decision-making in the context of planned birth: A survey study.
Coates D; Donnolley N; Foureur M; Thirukumar P; Henry A
Midwifery; 2021 May; 96():102944. PubMed ID: 33610064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Decision making in patient-initiated elective cesarean delivery: the influence of birth stories.
Munro S; Kornelsen J; Hutton E
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(5):373-379. PubMed ID: 19720338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
