240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23317175)
1. Bone response from a dynamic stimulus on a one-piece and multi-piece implant abutment and crown by finite element analysis.
Hajimiragha H; Abolbashari M; Nokar S; Abolbashari A; Abolbashari M
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Oct; 40(5):525-32. PubMed ID: 23317175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of implant design on the stress distribution in a three-unit implant-supported distal cantilever fixed partial denture: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
Koka P; Mohapatra A; Anandapandian PA; Murugesan K; Vasanthakumar M
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 22945697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Passivity versus unilateral angular misfit: evaluation of stress distribution on implant-supported single crowns: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Gomes EA; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Delben JA; Rocha EP; de Sousa EA
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1683-7. PubMed ID: 21119400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis.
Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Safari H; Samandari MM; Geramipanah F
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):548-57. PubMed ID: 25794917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of the implant design on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis of original computer-aided design models.
Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H
J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):e333-8. PubMed ID: 24835549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of placement depth of platform-switched implants on periimplant cortical bone stress: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Rismanchian M; Askari N; Shafiei S
Implant Dent; 2013 Apr; 22(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 23416848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stress distribution of an internal connection implant prostheses set: a 3D finite element analysis.
Segundo RM; Oshima HM; da Silva IN; Burnett LH; Mota EG; Silva LL
Stomatologija; 2009; 11(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 19773629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of different abutment and restorative crown materials on stress distribution in single-unit implant-supported restorations: A 3D finite element stress analysis.
Gökçimen G; Durkan R; Deste Gökay G; Oyar P
J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; 33(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 37434476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study.
Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of crown to implant ratio and implant dimensions on periimplant stress of splinted implant-supported crowns: a finite element analysis.
Bayraktar M; Gultekin BA; Yalcin S; Mijiritsky E
Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 23823738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the effect of two occlusal concepts for implant-supported fixed prostheses by finite element analysis in patients with bruxism.
Göre E; Evlioğlu G
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Feb; 40(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 22242658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Static and dynamic stress analysis of different crown materials on a titanium base abutment in an implant-supported single crown: a 3D finite element analysis.
Deste Gökay G; Oyar P; Gökçimen G; Durkan R
BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):545. PubMed ID: 38730391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis.
Liu S; Tang C; Yu J; Dai W; Bao Y; Hu D
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1111-8. PubMed ID: 24882594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of cusp inclination on stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses. A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Falcón-Antenucci RM; Pellizzer EP; de Carvalho PS; Goiato MC; Noritomi PY
J Prosthodont; 2010 Jul; 19(5):381-6. PubMed ID: 20345742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic nature of abutment screw retightening: finite element study of the effect of retightening on the settling effect.
Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Safari H; Samandari MM; Geramipanah F
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):412-9. PubMed ID: 25749092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
