These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23317646)

  • 1. Assessing the added value of health technologies: reconciling different perspectives.
    Drummond M; Tarricone R; Torbica A
    Value Health; 2013; 16(1 Suppl):S7-13. PubMed ID: 23317646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A changing paradigm in the study and adoption of emerging health care technologies: coverage with evidence development.
    Wallner PE; Konski A
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Nov; 5(11):1125-9. PubMed ID: 18954812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is there an alternative to quality-adjusted life years for supporting healthcare decision making?
    Beresniak A; Dupont D
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2016 Jun; 16(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 27139424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evolving provider payment models and patient access to innovative medical technology.
    Long G; Mortimer R; Sanzenbacher G
    J Med Econ; 2014 Dec; 17(12):883-93. PubMed ID: 25221929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Values and evidence colliding: health technology assessment in child health.
    Ungar WJ; Prosser LA; Burnett HF
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2013 Aug; 13(4):417-9. PubMed ID: 23977967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preferences on policy options for ensuring the financial sustainability of health care services in the future: results of a stakeholder survey.
    Tordrup D; Angelis A; Kanavos P
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Dec; 11(6):639-52. PubMed ID: 24129648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. American Society of Clinical Oncology guidance statement: the cost of cancer care.
    Meropol NJ; Schrag D; Smith TJ; Mulvey TM; Langdon RM; Blum D; Ubel PA; Schnipper LE;
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Aug; 27(23):3868-74. PubMed ID: 19581533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The changing role of economic evaluation in valuing medical technologies.
    Rotter JS; Foerster D; Bridges JF
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2012 Dec; 12(6):711-23. PubMed ID: 23252354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The payer's perspective: What is the burden of MS and how should the patient's perspective be integrated in health technology assessment conducted for taking decisions on access to care and treatment?
    Gold R; Toumi M; Meesen B; Fogarty E
    Mult Scler; 2016 Aug; 22(2 Suppl):60-70. PubMed ID: 27465616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Formal Implementation of Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations in Japan: A Unique Health Technology Assessment System.
    Hasegawa M; Komoto S; Shiroiwa T; Fukuda T
    Value Health; 2020 Jan; 23(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 31952673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions.
    Menon D; Stafinski T
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2011 Feb; 11(1):75-89. PubMed ID: 21351860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving Access to High-Cost Technologies in the Asia Region.
    Mundy L; Trowman R; Kearney B
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2019 Jan; 35(3):168-175. PubMed ID: 31122302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.
    Sullivan SD; Mauskopf JA; Augustovski F; Jaime Caro J; Lee KM; Minchin M; Orlewska E; Penna P; Rodriguez Barrios JM; Shau WY
    Value Health; 2014; 17(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 24438712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent amendments to NICE's value-based assessment of health technologies: implicitly inequitable?
    Paulden M
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2017 Jun; 17(3):239-242. PubMed ID: 28490259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 'Health Economics' and the evolution of economic evaluation of health technologies.
    Hutton J
    Health Econ; 2012 Jan; 21(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 22147623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of technology on health care cost and policy development.
    Wallner PE; Konski A
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2008 Jul; 18(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 18513629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uncertainties in real-world decisions on medical technologies.
    Lu CY
    Int J Clin Pract; 2014 Aug; 68(8):936-40. PubMed ID: 25074335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health technology assessment: research trends and future priorities in Europe.
    Nielsen CP; Funch TM; Kristensen FB
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2011 Jul; 16 Suppl 2():6-15. PubMed ID: 21737525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reimbursement programs and health technology assessment for diabetes devices and supplies: a Canadian perspective.
    Cheung RY; Mui V
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 May; 9(3):706-10. PubMed ID: 25697719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolving reimbursement and pricing policies for devices in Europe and the United States should encourage greater value.
    Sorenson C; Drummond M; Burns LR
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Apr; 32(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 23569060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.