These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23317897)

  • 1. Quality control protocol for confocal systems.
    Cornea A
    Methods Cell Biol; 2013; 113():51-8. PubMed ID: 23317897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving the sensitivity of confocal laser induced fluorescence detection to the sub-picomolar scale for round capillaries by laterally shifting the laser focus point.
    Zhu Y; Chen N; Li Q; Fang Q
    Analyst; 2013 Aug; 138(16):4642-8. PubMed ID: 23772440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standardization of fluorescence measurements: criteria for the choice of suitable standards and approaches to fit-for-purpose calibration tools.
    Resch-Genger U; Hoffmann K; Hoffmann A
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008; 1130():35-43. PubMed ID: 18596329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practical confocal microscopy and the evaluation of system performance.
    Zucker RM; Price OT
    Methods; 1999 Aug; 18(4):447-58. PubMed ID: 10491274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative image correction and calibration for confocal fluorescence microscopy using thin reference layers and SIPchart-based calibration procedures.
    Zwier JM; Oomen L; Brocks L; Jalink K; Brakenhoff GJ
    J Microsc; 2008 Jul; 231(Pt 1):59-69. PubMed ID: 18638190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intensity calibration and shading correction for fluorescence microscopes.
    Model MA
    Curr Protoc Cytom; 2006 Aug; Chapter 10():Unit10.14. PubMed ID: 18770832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating confocal microscopy system performance.
    Zucker RM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1075():321-74. PubMed ID: 24052361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multi-photon microscopy: seeing more by imaging less.
    White N; Errington R
    Biotechniques; 2002 Aug; 33(2):298-300, 302, 304-5. PubMed ID: 12188180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fluorescence microscopy--avoiding the pitfalls.
    Brown CM
    J Cell Sci; 2007 May; 120(Pt 10):1703-5. PubMed ID: 17502480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intensity calibration and flat-field correction for fluorescence microscopes.
    Model M
    Curr Protoc Cytom; 2014 Apr; 68():10.14.1-10.14.10. PubMed ID: 24692055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Method of calibration of a fluorescence microscope for quantitative studies.
    Kedziora KM; Prehn JH; Dobrucki J; Bernas T
    J Microsc; 2011 Oct; 244(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 21756257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of confocal microscopy system performance.
    Zucker RM; Price O
    Cytometry; 2001 Aug; 44(4):273-94. PubMed ID: 11500845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. eSIP: A Novel Solution-Based Sectioned Image Property Approach for Microscope Calibration.
    Butzlaff M; Weigel A; Ponimaskin E; Zeug A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134980. PubMed ID: 26244982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The 39 steps: a cautionary tale of quantitative 3-D fluorescence microscopy.
    Pawley J
    Biotechniques; 2000 May; 28(5):884-6, 888. PubMed ID: 10818693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of confocal microscopy system performance.
    Zucker RM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2006; 319():77-135. PubMed ID: 16719352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality assessment of confocal microscopy slide based systems: performance.
    Zucker RM
    Cytometry A; 2006 Jul; 69(7):659-76. PubMed ID: 16807897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of laser-induced thermal damage in fresh skin with ex vivo confocal microscopy.
    Ortner VK; Sahu A; Haedersdal M; Rajadhyaksha M; Rossi AM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Jan; 84(1):e19-e21. PubMed ID: 32948344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simultaneous Polychromatic Immunofluorescent Staining of Tissue Sections and Consecutive Imaging of up to Seven Parameters by Standard Confocal Microscopy.
    Schmidt AJ; Mayer JU; Wallace PK; Ronchese F; Price KM
    Curr Protoc Cytom; 2019 Dec; 91(1):e64. PubMed ID: 31763771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-laser dual-immunofluorescence confocal laser scanning microscopy using Cy2- and Cy5-conjugated secondary antibodies: unequivocal detection of co-localization of neuronal markers.
    Wouterlood FG; Van Denderen JC; Blijleven N; Van Minnen J; Härtig W
    Brain Res Brain Res Protoc; 1998 Jan; 2(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 9473644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Practical aspects of quantitative confocal microscopy.
    Murray JM
    Methods Cell Biol; 2013; 114():427-40. PubMed ID: 23931517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.