145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23318380)
1. A study on image quality provided by a kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography.
Garayoa J; Castro P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 14(1):3888. PubMed ID: 23318380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High temporal resolution and streak-free four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography.
Leng S; Tang J; Zambelli J; Nett B; Tolakanahalli R; Chen GH
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(20):5653-73. PubMed ID: 18812650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative evaluation of a cone-beam computed tomography-planning computed tomography deformable image registration method for adaptive radiation therapy.
Lawson JD; Schreibmann E; Jani AB; Fox T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 8(4):96-113. PubMed ID: 18449149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the OSC-TV iterative reconstruction algorithm for cone-beam optical CT.
Matenine D; Mascolo-Fortin J; Goussard Y; Després P
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6376-86. PubMed ID: 26520729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A GPU tool for efficient, accurate, and realistic simulation of cone beam CT projections.
Jia X; Yan H; Cervino L; Folkerts M; Jiang SB
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7368-78. PubMed ID: 23231286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characteristics of megavoltage cone-beam digital tomosynthesis.
Descovich M; Morin O; Aubry JF; Aubin M; Chen J; Bani-Hashemi A; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1310-6. PubMed ID: 18491525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality and absorbed dose comparison of single- and dual-source cone-beam computed tomography.
Miura H; Ozawa S; Okazue T; Kawakubo A; Yamada K; Nagata Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):360-366. PubMed ID: 29667294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interleaved acquisition for cross scatter avoidance in dual cone-beam CT.
Giles W; Bowsher J; Li H; Yin FF
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7719-28. PubMed ID: 23231319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of three dead detector correction methods for cone-beam computed tomography.
Nelms DW; Shukla HI; Nixon E; Bayouth JE; Flynn RT
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4569-76. PubMed ID: 19928088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation and Clinical Application of a Commercially Available Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm for CBCT-Based IGRT.
Mao W; Liu C; Gardner SJ; Siddiqui F; Snyder KC; Kumarasiri A; Zhao B; Kim J; Wen NW; Movsas B; Chetty IJ
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 18():1533033818823054. PubMed ID: 30803367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors.
Siewerdsen JH; Moseley DJ; Bakhtiar B; Richard S; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3506-20. PubMed ID: 15651634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A general framework and review of scatter correction methods in x-ray cone-beam computerized tomography. Part 1: Scatter compensation approaches.
Rührnschopf EP; Klingenbeck K
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4296-311. PubMed ID: 21859031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Streaking artifacts reduction in four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography.
Leng S; Zambelli J; Tolakanahalli R; Nett B; Munro P; Star-Lack J; Paliwal B; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4649-59. PubMed ID: 18975711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image quality and stability of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) devices: A comparative study.
Stock M; Pasler M; Birkfellner W; Homolka P; Poetter R; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 19695725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shading correction for on-board cone-beam CT in radiation therapy using planning MDCT images.
Niu T; Sun M; Star-Lack J; Gao H; Fan Q; Zhu L
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5395-406. PubMed ID: 21089775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved image quality of cone beam CT scans for radiotherapy image guidance using fiber-interspaced antiscatter grid.
Stankovic U; van Herk M; Ploeger LS; Sonke JJ
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061910. PubMed ID: 24877821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cone-beam CT dose and imaging performance evaluation with a modular, multipurpose phantom.
Siewerdsen JH; Uneri A; Hernandez AM; Burkett GW; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):467-479. PubMed ID: 31808950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of imaging performance of megavoltage cone-beam CT over an extended period.
Sumida I; Yamaguchi H; Kizaki H; Yamada Y; Koizumi M; Yoshioka Y; Ogawa K; Kakimoto N; Murakami S; Furukawa S
J Radiat Res; 2014 Jan; 55(1):191-9. PubMed ID: 23979076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Volume-of-interest cone-beam CT using a 2.35 MV beam generated with a carbon target.
Robar JL; Parsons D; Berman A; Macdonald A
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4209-18. PubMed ID: 22830754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of image quality for different kV cone-beam CT acquisition and reconstruction methods in the head and neck region.
Elstrøm UV; Muren LP; Petersen JB; Grau C
Acta Oncol; 2011 Aug; 50(6):908-17. PubMed ID: 21767191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
