262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23318394)
1. A framework for deformable image registration validation in radiotherapy clinical applications.
Varadhan R; Karangelis G; Krishnan K; Hui S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 14(1):4066. PubMed ID: 23318394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Site-specific deformable imaging registration algorithm selection using patient-based simulated deformations.
Nie K; Chuang C; Kirby N; Braunstein S; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041911. PubMed ID: 23556905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the dosimetric effect and reduction of inverse consistency and transitivity errors in deformable image registration for dose accumulation.
Bender ET; Hardcastle N; Tomé WA
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):272-80. PubMed ID: 22225297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of deformable image registration accuracy using computational modeling.
Zhong H; Kim J; Chetty IJ
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):970-9. PubMed ID: 20384233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of three deformable image registration algorithms for the thorax.
Latifi K; Zhang G; Stawicki M; van Elmpt W; Dekker A; Forster K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 14(1):3834. PubMed ID: 23318377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of various deformable image registration algorithms for thoracic images.
Kadoya N; Fujita Y; Katsuta Y; Dobashi S; Takeda K; Kishi K; Kubozono M; Umezawa R; Sugawara T; Matsushita H; Jingu K
J Radiat Res; 2014 Jan; 55(1):175-82. PubMed ID: 23869025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A pseudoinverse deformation vector field generator and its applications.
Yan C; Zhong H; Murphy M; Weiss E; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1117-28. PubMed ID: 20384247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative evaluation of a cone-beam computed tomography-planning computed tomography deformable image registration method for adaptive radiation therapy.
Lawson JD; Schreibmann E; Jani AB; Fox T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 8(4):96-113. PubMed ID: 18449149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Demons deformable registration for CBCT-guided procedures in the head and neck: convergence and accuracy.
Nithiananthan S; Brock KK; Daly MJ; Chan H; Irish JC; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4755-64. PubMed ID: 19928106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The evaluation of a hybrid biomechanical deformable registration method on a multistage physical phantom with reproducible deformation.
Qin A; Ionascu D; Liang J; Han X; O'Connell N; Yan D
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):240. PubMed ID: 30514348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Object-constrained meshless deformable algorithm for high speed 3D nonrigid registration between CT and CBCT.
Chen T; Kim S; Goyal S; Jabbour S; Zhou J; Rajagopal G; Haffty B; Yue N
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):197-210. PubMed ID: 20175482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a commercial DIR platform for contour propagation in prostate cancer patients treated with IMRT/VMAT.
Hammers JE; Pirozzi S; Lindsay D; Kaidar-Person O; Tan X; Chen RC; Das SK; Mavroidis P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):14-25. PubMed ID: 32058663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration.
Kirby N; Chuang C; Ueda U; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011702. PubMed ID: 23298072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using patient-specific phantoms to evaluate deformable image registration algorithms for adaptive radiation therapy.
Stanley N; Glide-Hurst C; Kim J; Adams J; Li S; Wen N; Chetty IJ; Zhong H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 14(6):4363. PubMed ID: 24257278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comprehensive evaluation of ten deformable image registration algorithms for contour propagation between CT and cone-beam CT images in adaptive head & neck radiotherapy.
Li X; Zhang Y; Shi Y; Wu S; Xiao Y; Gu X; Zhen X; Zhou L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175906. PubMed ID: 28414799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantifying the accuracy of automated structure segmentation in 4D CT images using a deformable image registration algorithm.
Wijesooriya K; Weiss E; Dill V; Dong L; Mohan R; Joshi S; Keall PJ
Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1251-60. PubMed ID: 18491517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of accuracy of B-spline transformation-based deformable image registration with different parameter settings for thoracic images.
Kanai T; Kadoya N; Ito K; Onozato Y; Cho SY; Kishi K; Dobashi S; Umezawa R; Matsushita H; Takeda K; Jingu K
J Radiat Res; 2014 Nov; 55(6):1163-70. PubMed ID: 25053349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deformable image registration based automatic CT-to-CT contour propagation for head and neck adaptive radiotherapy in the routine clinical setting.
Kumarasiri A; Siddiqui F; Liu C; Yechieli R; Shah M; Pradhan D; Zhong H; Chetty IJ; Kim J
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121712. PubMed ID: 25471959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of 12 DIR algorithms in low-contrast regions for mass and density conserving deformation.
Yeo UJ; Supple JR; Taylor ML; Smith R; Kron T; Franich RD
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101701. PubMed ID: 24089891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A quantitative comparison of the performance of three deformable registration algorithms in radiotherapy.
Fabri D; Zambrano V; Bhatia A; Furtado H; Bergmann H; Stock M; Bloch C; Lütgendorf-Caucig C; Pawiro S; Georg D; Birkfellner W; Figl M
Z Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 23(4):279-90. PubMed ID: 23969092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
