These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23318409)
21. Comparing Strategies for Magnetic Functionalization of Microbubbles. Beguin E; Bau L; Shrivastava S; Stride E ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2019 Jan; 11(2):1829-1840. PubMed ID: 30574777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T-Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation. Khan AH; Jiang X; Kaushik A; Nair HS; Edirisinghe M; Mercado-Shekhar KP; Shekhar H; Dalvi SV Langmuir; 2022 Aug; 38(33):10288-10304. PubMed ID: 35943351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Focal areas of increased lipid concentration on the coating of microbubbles during short tone-burst ultrasound insonification. Kooiman K; van Rooij T; Qin B; Mastik F; Vos HJ; Versluis M; Klibanov AL; de Jong N; Villanueva FS; Chen X PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180747. PubMed ID: 28686673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Role of Microbubble Echo Phase Lag in Multipulse Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging. Tremblay-Darveau C; Sheeran PS; Vu CK; Williams R; Zhang Z; Bruce M; Burns PN IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Aug; 65(8):1389-1401. PubMed ID: 29993575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of resonance on transient microbubble acoustic response: Experimental observations and numerical simulations. Efthymiou K; Pelekasis N; Butler MB; Thomas DH; Sboros V J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Mar; 143(3):1392. PubMed ID: 29604664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optical Verification of Microbubble Response to Acoustic Radiation Force in Large Vessels With In Vivo Results. Wang S; Wang CY; Unnikrishnan S; Klibanov AL; Hossack JA; Mauldin FW Invest Radiol; 2015 Nov; 50(11):772-84. PubMed ID: 26135018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An Ultrasound Enhancing Agent with Nonlinear Acoustic Activity that Depends on the Presence of an Electric Field. Cimorelli M; Flynn MA; Angel B; Fafarman A; Kohut A; Wrenn S Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):2370-2387. PubMed ID: 32616427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. On the acoustic properties of vaporized submicron perfluorocarbon droplets. Reznik N; Lajoinie G; Shpak O; Gelderblom EC; Williams R; de Jong N; Versluis M; Burns PN Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1379-84. PubMed ID: 24462162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Investigating the subharmonic response of individual phospholipid encapsulated microbubbles at high frequencies: a comparative study of five agents. Helfield BL; Cherin E; Foster FS; Goertz DE Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 May; 38(5):846-63. PubMed ID: 22402024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The onset of microbubble vibration. Emmer M; van Wamel A; Goertz DE; de Jong N Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 33(6):941-9. PubMed ID: 17451868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Modulation of the molecular arrangement in artificial and biological membranes by phospholipid-shelled microbubbles. Carugo D; Aron M; Sezgin E; Bernardino de la Serna J; Kuimova MK; Eggeling C; Stride E Biomaterials; 2017 Jan; 113():105-117. PubMed ID: 27814482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Nonlinear resonance behavior and linear shell estimates for Definityâ„¢ and MicroMarkerâ„¢ assessed with acoustic microbubble spectroscopy. Helfield BL; Goertz DE J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):1158-68. PubMed ID: 23363132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The polydisperse acoustic signature of rigid microbubbles. Dermitzakis A; Butler MB; Thomas DH; Sboros V Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():133-6. PubMed ID: 26736218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]