148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23318409)
21. Comparing Strategies for Magnetic Functionalization of Microbubbles.
Beguin E; Bau L; Shrivastava S; Stride E
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2019 Jan; 11(2):1829-1840. PubMed ID: 30574777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T-Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation.
Khan AH; Jiang X; Kaushik A; Nair HS; Edirisinghe M; Mercado-Shekhar KP; Shekhar H; Dalvi SV
Langmuir; 2022 Aug; 38(33):10288-10304. PubMed ID: 35943351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Focal areas of increased lipid concentration on the coating of microbubbles during short tone-burst ultrasound insonification.
Kooiman K; van Rooij T; Qin B; Mastik F; Vos HJ; Versluis M; Klibanov AL; de Jong N; Villanueva FS; Chen X
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180747. PubMed ID: 28686673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Role of Microbubble Echo Phase Lag in Multipulse Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.
Tremblay-Darveau C; Sheeran PS; Vu CK; Williams R; Zhang Z; Bruce M; Burns PN
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Aug; 65(8):1389-1401. PubMed ID: 29993575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of resonance on transient microbubble acoustic response: Experimental observations and numerical simulations.
Efthymiou K; Pelekasis N; Butler MB; Thomas DH; Sboros V
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Mar; 143(3):1392. PubMed ID: 29604664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optical Verification of Microbubble Response to Acoustic Radiation Force in Large Vessels With In Vivo Results.
Wang S; Wang CY; Unnikrishnan S; Klibanov AL; Hossack JA; Mauldin FW
Invest Radiol; 2015 Nov; 50(11):772-84. PubMed ID: 26135018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An Ultrasound Enhancing Agent with Nonlinear Acoustic Activity that Depends on the Presence of an Electric Field.
Cimorelli M; Flynn MA; Angel B; Fafarman A; Kohut A; Wrenn S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):2370-2387. PubMed ID: 32616427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. On the acoustic properties of vaporized submicron perfluorocarbon droplets.
Reznik N; Lajoinie G; Shpak O; Gelderblom EC; Williams R; de Jong N; Versluis M; Burns PN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1379-84. PubMed ID: 24462162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Investigating the subharmonic response of individual phospholipid encapsulated microbubbles at high frequencies: a comparative study of five agents.
Helfield BL; Cherin E; Foster FS; Goertz DE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 May; 38(5):846-63. PubMed ID: 22402024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The onset of microbubble vibration.
Emmer M; van Wamel A; Goertz DE; de Jong N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 33(6):941-9. PubMed ID: 17451868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of lipid shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-induced microbubble destruction.
Borden MA; Kruse DE; Caskey CF; Zhao S; Dayton PA; Ferrara KW
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Nov; 52(11):1992-2002. PubMed ID: 16422411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of temperature on the acoustic response and stability of size-isolated protein-shelled ultrasound contrast agents and SonoVue.
Kaushik A; Khan AH; Pratibha ; Dalvi SV; Shekhar H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Apr; 153(4):2324. PubMed ID: 37092939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Spectral Imaging for Microbubble Characterization.
Browning RJ; Aron M; Booth A; Rademeyer P; Wing S; Brans V; Shrivastava S; Carugo D; Stride E
Langmuir; 2020 Jan; 36(2):609-617. PubMed ID: 31855435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Modulation of the molecular arrangement in artificial and biological membranes by phospholipid-shelled microbubbles.
Carugo D; Aron M; Sezgin E; Bernardino de la Serna J; Kuimova MK; Eggeling C; Stride E
Biomaterials; 2017 Jan; 113():105-117. PubMed ID: 27814482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Nonlinear resonance behavior and linear shell estimates for Definity™ and MicroMarker™ assessed with acoustic microbubble spectroscopy.
Helfield BL; Goertz DE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):1158-68. PubMed ID: 23363132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The polydisperse acoustic signature of rigid microbubbles.
Dermitzakis A; Butler MB; Thomas DH; Sboros V
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():133-6. PubMed ID: 26736218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Individual lipid encapsulated microbubble radial oscillations: Effects of fluid viscosity.
Helfield B; Chen X; Qin B; Villanueva FS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):204-14. PubMed ID: 26827018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. High-speed optical observations and simulation results of SonoVue microbubbles at low-pressure insonation.
Chetty K; Stride E; Sennoga CA; Hajnal JV; Eckersley RJ
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008; 55(6):1333-42. PubMed ID: 18599421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optimal design and experimental investigation of surfactant encapsulated microbubbles.
Zong Y; Wan M; Wang S; Zhang G
Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e119-22. PubMed ID: 16859725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Lung surfactant microbubbles increase lipophilic drug payload for ultrasound-targeted delivery.
Sirsi SR; Fung C; Garg S; Tianning MY; Mountford PA; Borden MA
Theranostics; 2013; 3(6):409-19. PubMed ID: 23781287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
