These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2331951)

  • 1. Fate of antacid gel in the stomach. Site of action and interaction with food.
    Bauerfeind P; Cilluffo T; Armstrong D; Emde C; Müller-Duysing W; Duroux P; Blum AL
    Dig Dis Sci; 1990 May; 35(5):553-8. PubMed ID: 2331951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regional differences in gastric acidity and antacid distribution: is a single pH electrode sufficient?
    Fisher RS; Sher DJ; Donahue D; Knight LC; Maurer A; Urbain JL; Krevsky B
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1997 Feb; 92(2):263-70. PubMed ID: 9040203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interaction of liquid aluminium phosphate and aluminium hydroxide with the gastric acid profile. Influence of food components and timing of meals.
    Schürer-Maly CC; Varga L; Halter F
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1992 Apr; 27(4):263-9. PubMed ID: 1589702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of antacid characteristics of drugs containing a combination of aluminium and magnesium salts using the "artificial stomach" model.
    Vatier J; Vitre MT; Lionnet F; Poitevin C; Mignon M
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1990 Jan; 40(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 2339999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An artificial stomach-duodenum model for the in-vitro evaluation of antacids.
    Vatier J; Malikova-Sekera E; Vitre MT; Mignon M
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 1992 Aug; 6(4):447-58. PubMed ID: 1420737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A single intragastric pH electrode does not accurately measure intragastric acidity.
    Fisher RS; Sher DJ; Donahue D; Senior J; Krevsky B
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Jun; 91(6):1167-72. PubMed ID: 8651165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interests of the 'artificial stomach' techniques to study antacid formulations: comparison with in vivo evaluation.
    Vatier J; Célice-Pingaud C; Farinotti R
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 1998; 12(6):573-83. PubMed ID: 9818289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antacid activity of calcium carbonate and hydrotalcite tablets. Comparison between in vitro evaluation using the "artificial stomach-duodenum" model and in vivo pH-metry in healthy volunteers.
    Vatier J; Ramdani A; Vitré MT; Mignon M
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1994 Apr; 44(4):514-8. PubMed ID: 8011006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [In vitro evaluation of antacid activity in gastric acid secretion in static and dynamic systems].
    Vatier J; Malikova-Sekera E; Vitre MT; Mignon M
    Therapie; 1992; 47(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 1412150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods for the assessment of antacids. In-vitro and in-vivo investigations with gastric aspiration.
    Keyriläinen O
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1982; 75():40-3. PubMed ID: 6959249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of buffering capacity and acid neutralizing-pH time profile of antacids.
    Lin MS; Sun P; Yu HY
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1998 Oct; 97(10):704-10. PubMed ID: 9830281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A model of an 'artificial stomach' for assessing the characteristics of an antacid.
    Vatier J; Lionnet F; Vitré MT; Mignon M
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 1988 Oct; 2(5):461-70. PubMed ID: 2979268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of ambulatory gastric pH recordings in the corpus and antrum. Effect of food, time, and electrode position.
    Cilluffo T; Armstrong D; Castiglione F; Emde C; Galeazzi R; Gonvers JJ; Blum AL
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1990 Oct; 25(10):1076-83. PubMed ID: 2263880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Antacid action of the aluminum cation: comparison of the in vitro effect of hydroxide and phosphate in open and closed systems].
    Vatier J; Lionnet F; Vitre MT
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1987 Nov; 11(11):758-63. PubMed ID: 3428519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fate of oral neutralizing antacid and its effect on postprandial gastric secretion and emptying.
    Deering TB; Carlson GL; Malagelada JR; Duenes JA; McCall JT
    Gastroenterology; 1979 Nov; 77(5):986-90. PubMed ID: 39873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of low-dose antacids, cimetidine, and placebo on 24-hour intragastric acidity in healthy volunteers.
    Weberg R; Berstad A; Osnes M
    Dig Dis Sci; 1992 Dec; 37(12):1810-4. PubMed ID: 1473428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of antacid on gastric and duodenal bulb acidity.
    Hannibal S; Remvig L; Rune SJ
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1980; 58():29-36. PubMed ID: 6929092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Bacterial colonization of the stomach caused by acid neutralization and inhibition of stomach emptying].
    Hagel HJ; Mueller RL; Schoenherr U; Greim G; Ruppin H; Domschke W
    Z Gastroenterol; 1985 Apr; 23(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 3904244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of gastric body and antral pH: a 24 hour ambulatory study in healthy volunteers.
    McLauchlan G; Fullarton GM; Crean GP; McColl KE
    Gut; 1989 May; 30(5):573-8. PubMed ID: 2731749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [pH gradient support and antacid action of gastroesophageal coating agents. In vitro pharmacologic study using a model of "the artificial stomach"].
    Vatier J; Vitre MT; Vallot T; Mignon M
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1990; 14(5):414-22. PubMed ID: 2163935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.