242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23321246)
1. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
Schäfer E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing apical preparations of root canals shaped by nickel-titanium rotary instruments and nickel-titanium hand instruments.
Deplazes P; Peters O; Barbakow F
J Endod; 2001 Mar; 27(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 11487151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators.
Gluskin AH; Brown DC; Buchanan LS
Int Endod J; 2001 Sep; 34(6):476-84. PubMed ID: 11556516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vitro comparison of canal preparation using two automated rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation techniques.
Jardine SJ; Gulabivala K
Int Endod J; 2000 Jul; 33(4):381-91. PubMed ID: 11307215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The effect of instrumentation on original apical foramen shape using steel vs niti rotatory: computerized analysis].
Gallina G; Cumbo E; Gallo P; Pizzo G; D'Angelo M
Minerva Stomatol; 2002; 51(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 11845115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile--Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and instrumentation results in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Lohmann D
Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 12190908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Versümer J; Hülsmann M; Schäfers F
Int Endod J; 2002 Jan; 35(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11853237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
Schäfer E; Florek H
Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 12657146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in root canal morphology in simulated curved canals over-instrumented with a variety of stainless steel and nickel titanium files.
Lam TV; Lewis DJ; Atkins DR; Macfarlane RH; Clarkson RM; Whitehead MG; Brockhurst PJ; Moule AJ
Aust Dent J; 1999 Mar; 44(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 10217015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative analysis of curved root canal preparation using nickel-titanium instruments with or without EDTA.
Bramante CM; Betti LV
J Endod; 2000 May; 26(5):278-80. PubMed ID: 11199735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile--Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
Schäfer E; Lohmann D
Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 12190907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preparation of severely curved simulated root canals using engine-driven rotary and conventional hand instruments.
Szep S; Gerhardt T; Leitzbach C; Lüder W; Heidemann D
Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 11355093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Curved molar root canal preparations using Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Bertrand MF; Lupi-Pégurier L; Médioni E; Muller M; Bolla M
Int Endod J; 2001 Dec; 34(8):631-6. PubMed ID: 11762500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of root canal preparation with HERO 642 and Quantec SC rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Hülsmann M; Schade M; Schäfers F
Int Endod J; 2001 Oct; 34(7):538-46. PubMed ID: 11601772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique.
Chen JL; Messer HH
Aust Dent J; 2002 Mar; 47(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 12035951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Volumetric Analysis of Hand and Rotary Instrumentation, Root Canal Filling Techniques, and Obturation Materials in Primary Teeth Using Spiral CT.
Yadav DBU; Varma RB; Kumar JS; Kumaran P; Xavier AM; Venugopal M; Thankappan N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Mar; 25(3):250-259. PubMed ID: 38690699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shaping ability of Quantec Series 2000 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 2.
Thompson SA; Dummer PM
Int Endod J; 1998 Jul; 31(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 9823116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
