142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23321246)
21. Comparison of Cleaning Efficacy and Instrumentation Time in Primary Molars: Mtwo Rotary Instruments vs. Hand K-Files.
Ramezanali F; Afkhami F; Soleimani A; Kharrazifard MJ; Rafiee F
Iran Endod J; 2015; 10(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 26523138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The extended finite element method in endodontics: A scoping review and future directions for cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium instruments.
Chien PY; Walsh LJ; Peters OA
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2024 Jun; 10(3):e893. PubMed ID: 38770579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance of thermomechanically treated NiTi rotary instruments in simulated curved canals with two different radii of curvature: An
Hamid T; Malik A; Kumar A; Anjum S
J Conserv Dent Endod; 2024 Apr; 27(4):393-399. PubMed ID: 38779209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Surface roughness and cyclic fatigue resistance of a novel shaping system: An in-vitro study.
Özel B; Barut G; Baser Can ED
PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0302551. PubMed ID: 38696475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of Endodontic Instrumentation on Surface Roughness of Various Nickel-Titanium Rotary Files.
Zafar MS
Eur J Dent; 2021 May; 15(2):273-280. PubMed ID: 33111285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cryotherapy Treatment Effect on Heat-Treated Nickel-Titanium (NiTi) Rotary Single-File System: An In Vitro Comparative Study by Finite Element Analysis.
Chakaravarthy Y; Prasad V; Dattatray Revankar V; Karthikeyan H; Saravanan S; Santosh A
Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e60271. PubMed ID: 38872702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An in vivo comparison of accuracy of two electronic apex locators in determining working length using stainless steel and nickel titanium files.
Chaudhary S; Gharti A; Adhikari B
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2018; 10():75-82. PubMed ID: 29861643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Foramen Changes following Over Instrumentation of Curved Canals with Three Engine-Driven Instruments: An
Yammine S; Jabbour E; Nahas P; Majzoub Z
Iran Endod J; 2017; 12(4):454-461. PubMed ID: 29225641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative Evaluation of Cutting Efficiency of Three File Systems-Kedo-SH Manual, Pedoflex Rotary, and Manual K File: An
Kesri R; Pardhi N; Surana P; Ukey A; Agrawal PK; Agrawal S
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Feb; 16(Suppl 1):S239-S242. PubMed ID: 38595499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Survey on Nickel Titanium Rotary Instruments and their Usage Techniques by Endodontists in India.
Patil TN; Saraf PA; Penukonda R; Vanaki SS; Kamatagi L
J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 May; 11(5):ZC29-ZC35. PubMed ID: 28658903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Length of endodontic files measured in digital radiographs with and without noise-suppression filters: an ex-vivo study.
Brüllmann DD; Röhrig B; Sulayman SL; Schulze R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Mar; 40(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 21346084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Endodontic Treatment of a Dilacerated Maxillary Second Premolar With a Severely Curved Root Canal: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Liu H; Hao J; Shen Y
Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e59590. PubMed ID: 38826877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Rotary endodontics in primary teeth - A review.
George S; Anandaraj S; Issac JS; John SA; Harris A
Saudi Dent J; 2016 Jan; 28(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 26792964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Effect of surface topographical changes of two different surface treatments rotary instrument.
Qaed NA; Mourshed BD; Al-Shamiri HM; Alaizari N; Alhamdah SS
J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Jan; 10(1):e49-e53. PubMed ID: 29670715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Root Canal Instrumentation: Current Trends and Future Perspectives.
Srivastava S
Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e58045. PubMed ID: 38738101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of rotary protaper, one shape system and wave one system using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study.
Tambe VH; Nagmode PS; Abraham S; Patait M; Lahoti PV; Jaju N
J Conserv Dent; 2014 Nov; 17(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 25506145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of different rotary NiTi instruments in curved canals using CBCT.
Arora A; Taneja S; Kumar M
J Conserv Dent; 2014 Jan; 17(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 24554858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the Shaping Characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in Curved Canals.
Gagliardi J; Versiani MA; de Sousa-Neto MD; Plazas-Garzon A; Basrani B
J Endod; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1718-24. PubMed ID: 26321062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals.
Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2015 Feb; 48(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 24697590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
