832 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23321246)
41. An in vitro comparison of Profile GT and GTX nickel-titanium rotary instruments in apical transportation and length control in mandibular molar.
Iqbal MK; Floratos S; Hsu YK; Karabucak B
J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):302-4. PubMed ID: 20113795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of twisted files, Pathfile-ProTaper system, and stainless steel hand K-files by using computed tomography.
Gergi R; Rjeily JA; Sader J; Naaman A
J Endod; 2010 May; 36(5):904-7. PubMed ID: 20416443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The influence of different angles and reciprocation on the shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments.
Al-Sudani D; Kaabi H; Al Gamdi A; Al Dakheel A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jul; 15(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 25576112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Hand and nickel-titanium root canal instrumentation performed by dental students: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Peru M; Peru C; Mannocci F; Sherriff M; Buchanan LS; Pitt Ford TR
Eur J Dent Educ; 2006 Feb; 10(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16436085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Radiographic identification of separated instruments retained in the apical third of root canal-filled teeth.
Rosen E; Azizi H; Friedlander C; Taschieri S; Tsesis I
J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1549-52. PubMed ID: 25159723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Shaping of curved root canals instrumented with stainless steel and nickel titanium files.
Atlas DM; Leonardi L; Raiden G
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2005; 18(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 16302457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of two different nickel-titanium rotary files in curved root canals of extracted human molar teeth.
Ferrara G; Taschieri S; Corbella S; Ceci C; Del Fabbro M; Machtou P
J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 Feb; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 26343421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Iqbal MK; Firic S; Tulcan J; Karabucak B; Kim S
Int Endod J; 2004 Jun; 37(6):359-64. PubMed ID: 15186241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparing apical preparations of root canals shaped by nickel-titanium rotary instruments and nickel-titanium hand instruments.
Deplazes P; Peters O; Barbakow F
J Endod; 2001 Mar; 27(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 11487151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex instruments.
Capar ID; Arslan H; Akcay M; Ertas H
J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1638-41. PubMed ID: 25260737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Shaping ability of NiTi rotary versus stainless steel hand instruments in simulated curved canals.
Sadeghi S
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2011 May; 16(3):e454-8. PubMed ID: 20711134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Bürklein S; Benten S; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2013 Jun; 46(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 23240965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.
Paqué F; Ganahl D; Peters OA
J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1056-9. PubMed ID: 19567334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals.
Elayouti A; Chu AL; Kimionis I; Klein C; Weiger R; Löst C
Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 19133098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators.
Gluskin AH; Brown DC; Buchanan LS
Int Endod J; 2001 Sep; 34(6):476-84. PubMed ID: 11556516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. An in vitro comparison of canal preparation using two automated rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation techniques.
Jardine SJ; Gulabivala K
Int Endod J; 2000 Jul; 33(4):381-91. PubMed ID: 11307215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file.
Yoldas O; Yilmaz S; Atakan G; Kuden C; Kasan Z
J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 22244643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
