These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23321832)
1. Agreement and reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements of dual-b-value and multi-b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla in phantom and in soft tissues of the abdomen. Corona-Villalobos CP; Pan L; Halappa VG; Bonekamp S; Lorenz CH; Eng J; Kamel IR J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 23321832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Field strength and diffusion encoding technique affect the apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen. Dale BM; Braithwaite AC; Boll DT; Merkle EM Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 20027117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dual-source parallel RF transmission for diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen using different b values: image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient comparison with conventional single-source transmission. Guo L; Liu C; Chen W; Chan Q; Wang G J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Apr; 37(4):875-85. PubMed ID: 23097254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short- and midterm reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements at 3.0-T diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen. Braithwaite AC; Dale BM; Boll DT; Merkle EM Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):459-65. PubMed ID: 19095786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ADC measurement of abdominal organs and lesions using parallel imaging technique. Yoshikawa T; Kawamitsu H; Mitchell DG; Ohno Y; Ku Y; Seo Y; Fujii M; Sugimura K AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1521-30. PubMed ID: 17114546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of measurement parameters on apparent diffusion coefficient quantification in diffusion-weighted-magnetic resonance imaging. Schmidt H; Gatidis S; Schwenzer NF; Martirosian P Invest Radiol; 2015 Jan; 50(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 25247326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of upper abdominal organs: field strength and intervendor variability of apparent diffusion coefficients. Donati OF; Chong D; Nanz D; Boss A; Froehlich JM; Andres E; Seifert B; Thoeny HC Radiology; 2014 Feb; 270(2):454-63. PubMed ID: 24471390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Malignant hepatic tumors: short-term reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficients with breath-hold and respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Kim SY; Lee SS; Byun JH; Park SH; Kim JK; Park B; Kim N; Lee MG Radiology; 2010 Jun; 255(3):815-23. PubMed ID: 20501719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis with diffusion-weighted imaging: value of normalized apparent diffusion coefficient using the spleen as reference organ. Do RK; Chandarana H; Felker E; Hajdu CH; Babb JS; Kim D; Taouli B AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):671-6. PubMed ID: 20729445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductibility of apparent diffusion coefficients measurements in diffusion-weighted MRI of the abdomen with different b values. Bilgili MY Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2066-8. PubMed ID: 21724354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR-diffusion weighted imaging of healthy liver parenchyma: repeatability and reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement. Colagrande S; Pasquinelli F; Mazzoni LN; Belli G; Virgili G J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Apr; 31(4):912-20. PubMed ID: 20373436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lymphomas and glioblastomas: differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient evaluated with high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. Doskaliyev A; Yamasaki F; Ohtaki M; Kajiwara Y; Takeshima Y; Watanabe Y; Takayasu T; Amatya VJ; Akiyama Y; Sugiyama K; Kurisu K Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 21129872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the spleen in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Klasen J; Lanzman RS; Wittsack HJ; Kircheis G; Schek J; Quentin M; Antoch G; Häussinger D; Blondin D Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 31(7):1092-6. PubMed ID: 23731536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-breath-hold high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI with parallel imaging technique: apparent diffusion coefficient determination in normal abdominal organs. Kiliçkesmez O; Yirik G; Bayramoğlu S; Cimilli T; Aydin S Diagn Interv Radiol; 2008 Jun; 14(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 18553281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of human skeletal muscles: gender-, age- and muscle-related differences in apparent diffusion coefficient. Yanagisawa O; Shimao D; Maruyama K; Nielsen M; Irie T; Niitsu M Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 27(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 18650046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the healthy pancreas: apparent diffusion coefficient values of the normal head, body, and tail calculated from different sets of b-values. Schoennagel BP; Habermann CR; Roesch M; Hahne JD; Arndt C; Kleibeler L; Petersen KU; Graessner J; Adam G; Herrmann J J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Oct; 34(4):861-5. PubMed ID: 21837782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Liver diffusion-weighted MR imaging: reproducibility comparison of ADC measurements obtained with multiple breath-hold, free-breathing, respiratory-triggered, and navigator-triggered techniques. Chen X; Qin L; Pan D; Huang Y; Yan L; Wang G; Liu Y; Liang C; Liu Z Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):113-25. PubMed ID: 24475860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen at 3.0 Tesla: image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient reproducibility compared with 1.5 Tesla. Rosenkrantz AB; Oei M; Babb JS; Niver BE; Taouli B J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 33(1):128-35. PubMed ID: 21182130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproducibility of measurement of apparent diffusion coefficients of malignant hepatic tumors: effect of DWI techniques and calculation methods. Kim SY; Lee SS; Park B; Kim N; Kim JK; Park SH; Byun JH; Song KJ; Koo JH; Choi EK; Lee MG J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Nov; 36(5):1131-8. PubMed ID: 22777895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between two-point and four-point methods for quantification of apparent diffusion coefficient of normal liver parenchyma and focal lesions. Value of normalization with spleen. Papanikolaou N; Gourtsoyianni S; Yarmenitis S; Maris T; Gourtsoyiannis N Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):305-9. PubMed ID: 19091503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]