These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23322617)

  • 1. Another look at the (im-)precision of individual risk estimates made using actuarial risk assessment instruments.
    Hart SD; Cooke DJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(1):81-102. PubMed ID: 23322617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: evaluating the 'margins of error' of group v. individual predictions of violence.
    Hart SD; Michie C; Cooke DJ
    Br J Psychiatry Suppl; 2007 May; 49():s60-5. PubMed ID: 17470944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Classification accuracy of actuarial risk assessment instruments.
    Neller DJ; Frederick RI
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(1):141-53. PubMed ID: 23322608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Bayesian approach to the group versus individual prediction controversy in actuarial risk assessment.
    Scurich N; John RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):237-46. PubMed ID: 22667813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applying a forensic actuarial assessment (the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide) to nonforensic patients.
    Harris GT; Rice ME; Camilleri JA
    J Interpers Violence; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1063-74. PubMed ID: 15296617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders.
    Harris GT; Rice ME; Quinsey VL; Lalumière ML; Boer D; Lang C
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):413-25. PubMed ID: 14593842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of framing actuarial risk probabilities on involuntary civil commitment decisions.
    Scurich N; John RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Apr; 35(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 20145984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Actuarial prediction of violent recidivism in mentally disordered offenders.
    Snowden RJ; Gray NS; Taylor J; MacCulloch MJ
    Psychol Med; 2007 Nov; 37(11):1539-49. PubMed ID: 17537287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Actuarial risk assessment: commentary on Berlin et al.
    Hart SD
    Sex Abuse; 2003 Oct; 15(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 14571542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From group data to useful probabilities: the relevance of actuarial risk assessment in individual instances.
    Mossman D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Mar; 43(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 25770285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of actuarials at civil commitment hearings to predict the likelihood of future sexual violence.
    Berlin FS; Galbreath NW; Geary B; McGlone G
    Sex Abuse; 2003 Oct; 15(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 14571541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.
    Rettenberger M; Matthes A; Boer DP; Eher R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 19168639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex offenders and actuarial risk assessments: ethical considerations.
    Campbell TW
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):269-79. PubMed ID: 12645049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for risk estimate precision: implications for individual risk communication.
    Harris GT; Lowenkamp CT; Hilton NZ
    Behav Sci Law; 2015 Feb; 33(1):111-27. PubMed ID: 25693954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Substance abuse among high-risk sexual offenders: do measures of lifetime history of substance abuse add to the prediction of recidivism over actuarial risk assessment instruments?
    Looman J; Abracen J
    J Interpers Violence; 2011 Mar; 26(4):683-700. PubMed ID: 20587448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: revised age weights.
    Helmus L; Thornton D; Hanson RK; Babchishin KM
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Feb; 24(1):64-101. PubMed ID: 21844404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Actuarial risk assessment models: a review of critical issues related to violence and sex-offender recidivism assessments.
    Sreenivasan S; Kirkish P; Garrick T; Weinberger LE; Phenix A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(4):438-48. PubMed ID: 11196254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A time series modeling approach in risk appraisal of violent and sexual recidivism.
    Bani-Yaghoub M; Fedoroff JP; Curry S; Amundsen DE
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Oct; 34(5):349-66. PubMed ID: 19399599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recidivism in female offenders: PCL-R lifestyle factor and VRAG show predictive validity in a German sample.
    Eisenbarth H; Osterheider M; Nedopil N; Stadtland C
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(5):575-84. PubMed ID: 22718134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools.
    Steadman HJ; Silver E; Monahan J; Appelbaum PS; Robbins PC; Mulvey EP; Grisso T; Roth LH; Banks S
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Feb; 24(1):83-100. PubMed ID: 10693320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.