107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2332308)
1. Effect of observer instruction on ROC study of chest images.
Gur D; Rockette HE; Good WF; Slasky BS; Cooperstein LA; Straub WH; Obuchowski NA; Metz CE
Invest Radiol; 1990 Mar; 25(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 2332308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of two rating formats in multi-disease ROC study of chest images.
Rockette HE; Gur D; Cooperstein LA; Obuchowski NA; King JL; Fuhrman CR; Tabor EK; Metz CE
Invest Radiol; 1990 Mar; 25(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 2332307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experiences with a teleradiology system in pulmonary diseases.
Korsoff L; Kallio T; Kormano M; Heinilä J
Acta Radiol; 1995 Jan; 36(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 7833166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images.
Slasky BS; Gur D; Good WF; Costa-Greco MA; Harris KM; Cooperstein LA; Rockette HE
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):775-80. PubMed ID: 2305061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs.
Herron JM; Bender TM; Campbell WL; Sumkin JH; Rockette HE; Gur D
Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 10751483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporal subtraction for detection of solitary pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: evaluation of a commercially available computer-aided diagnosis system.
Johkoh T; Kozuka T; Tomiyama N; Hamada S; Honda O; Mihara N; Koyama M; Tsubamoto M; Maeda M; Nakamura H; Saki H; Fujiwara K
Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):806-11. PubMed ID: 12034953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image compression and chest radiograph interpretation: image perception comparison between uncompressed chest radiographs and chest radiographs stored using 10:1 JPEG compression.
Beall DP; Shelton PD; Kinsey TV; Horton MC; Fortman BJ; Achenbach S; Smirnoff V; Courneya DL; Carpenter B; Gironda JT
J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):33-8. PubMed ID: 10847358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images.
Razavi M; Sayre JW; Taira RK; Simons M; Huang HK; Chuang KS; Rahbar G; Kangarloo H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):443-8. PubMed ID: 1729805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of observer performance on soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: high resolution liquid-crystal display monitors versus cathode-ray tube monitors.
Park CM; Lee HJ; Goo JM; Han DH; Kim JH; Lim KY; Kim SH; Kang JJ; Kim KG; Lee CH; Chun EJ; Im JG
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 66(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17689217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does knowledge of the clinical history affect the accuracy of chest radiograph interpretation?
Good BC; Cooperstein LA; DeMarino GB; Miketic LM; Gennari RC; Rockette HE; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Apr; 154(4):709-12. PubMed ID: 2107662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selection of subtle cases for observer-performance studies: the importance of knowing the true diagnosis.
Rockette HE; King JL; Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Slifko RM; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 1998 Feb; 5(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 9484540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variability in observer performance studies experimental observations.
Gur D; Rockette HE; Maitz GS; King JL; Klym AH; Bandos AI
Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1527-33. PubMed ID: 16321741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved detection of lung nodules by using a temporal subtraction technique.
Kakeda S; Nakamura K; Kamada K; Watanabe H; Nakata H; Katsuragawa S; Doi K
Radiology; 2002 Jul; 224(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 12091674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital storage phosphor chest radiography: an ROC study of the effect of 2K versus 4K matrix size on observer performance.
Miró SP; Leung AN; Rubin GD; Choi YH; Kee ST; Mindelzun RE; Stark P; Wexler L; Plevritis SK; Betts BJ
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 11161174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of image processing on chest radiograph interpretations in a PACS environment.
Rosenthal MS; Good WF; Costa-Greco MA; Miketic LM; Eeelkema EA; Gur D; Rockette HE
Invest Radiol; 1990 Aug; 25(8):897-901. PubMed ID: 2394572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reader variance in ROC studies--generalizability to reader population at high and low performance levels.
Gur D; Bandos AI; Klym AH; Rockette HE
Acad Radiol; 2006 Aug; 13(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 16843853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in lung cancer screening at chest MDCT: ROC analysis of CAD versus radiologist performance.
Fraioli F; Bertoletti L; Napoli A; Pediconi F; Calabrese FA; Masciangelo R; Catalano C; Passariello R
J Thorac Imaging; 2007 Aug; 22(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 17721333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Oliver JH; Britton CA; Campbell WL; Feist JH; Straub WH; Davis PL; Plunkett MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital and conventional chest imaging: a modified ROC study of observer performance using simulated nodules.
Chakraborty DP; Breatnach ES; Yester MV; Soto B; Barnes GT; Fraser RG
Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3940394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography.
MacMahon H; Doi K; Sanada S; Montner SM; Giger ML; Metz CE; Nakamori N; Yin FF; Xu XW; Yonekawa H
Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 1984299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
