These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23323693)

  • 1. Measuring healthcare process quality: applications in public hospitals in Turkey.
    Yildiz Ö; Demirörs O
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2013 Mar; 38(2):132-49. PubMed ID: 23323693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring health care process quality with software quality measures.
    Yildiz O; Demirörs O
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():1005-9. PubMed ID: 22874345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.
    Shaller D
    Pediatrics; 2004 Jan; 113(1 Pt 2):217-27. PubMed ID: 14702504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The central laboratory: who needs it?
    Berenblum EG
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 Jul; 30(7):60-2, 64. PubMed ID: 10182633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance measures for pneumonia: are they valuable, and are process measures adequate?
    Bratzler DW; Nsa W; Houck PM
    Curr Opin Infect Dis; 2007 Apr; 20(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 17496578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improvement and renewal of healthcare processes: results of an empirical research project.
    van der Bij JD; Dijkstra L; de Vries G; Walburg J
    Health Policy; 1999 Aug; 48(2):135-52. PubMed ID: 10557453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing operational effectiveness in healthcare organizations: a systematic approach.
    Gomes CF; Yasin MM; Yasin Y
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2010; 23(2):127-40. PubMed ID: 21388096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. As others see us, Part 2. Goals and the annual report: a system for performance evaluation.
    Miller JC
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 Jul; 30(7):54-6, 58-9. PubMed ID: 10182632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Achieving superior performance through process improvement.
    Mahlen KA
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1993 Sep; 47(9):45-6, 48, 50. PubMed ID: 10145868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A study of evaluation methods for hospital medical care systems.
    Nobukawa M; Eussen ME
    Jpn Hosp; 1992 Jul; 11():33-41. PubMed ID: 10120546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An open system approach to process reengineering in a healthcare operational environment.
    Czuchry AJ; Yasin MM; Norris J
    Health Mark Q; 2000; 17(3):77-88. PubMed ID: 11010221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the agency for healthcare research and quality pediatric quality indicators.
    Scanlon MC; Harris JM; Levy F; Sedman A
    Pediatrics; 2008 Jun; 121(6):e1723-31. PubMed ID: 18474532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes.
    Glickman SW; Boulding W; Roos JM; Staelin R; Peterson ED; Schulman KA
    Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 19648833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality evaluation and indicator comparison in health care.
    Øvretveit J
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2001; 16(3):229-41. PubMed ID: 11596559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A 10-year review of quality improvement monitoring in pain management: recommendations for standardized outcome measures.
    Gordon DB; Pellino TA; Miaskowski C; McNeill JA; Paice JA; Laferriere D; Bookbinder M
    Pain Manag Nurs; 2002 Dec; 3(4):116-30. PubMed ID: 12454804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].
    Giraldes Mdo R
    Acta Med Port; 2008; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ACCF/AHA methodology for the development of quality measures for cardiovascular technology: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.
    Bonow RO; Douglas PS; Buxton AE; Cohen DJ; Curtis JP; Delong E; Drozda JP; Ferguson TB; Heidenreich PA; Hendel RC; Masoudi FA; Peterson ED; Taylor AJ; ;
    Circulation; 2011 Sep; 124(13):1483-502. PubMed ID: 21875906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.
    Benedetto AR
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the quality of healthcare provided to children.
    Mangione-Smith R; McGlynn EA
    Health Serv Res; 1998 Oct; 33(4 Pt 2):1059-90. PubMed ID: 9776949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.