These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23323835)

  • 21. From Extraction of Local Structures of Protein Energy Landscapes to Improved Decoy Selection in Template-Free Protein Structure Prediction.
    Akhter N; Shehu A
    Molecules; 2018 Jan; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 29351266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Network properties of protein-decoy structures.
    Chatterjee S; Bhattacharyya M; Vishveshwara S
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2012; 29(6):606-22. PubMed ID: 22545992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. ProVal: a protein-scoring function for the selection of native and near-native folds.
    Berglund A; Head RD; Welsh EA; Marshall GR
    Proteins; 2004 Feb; 54(2):289-302. PubMed ID: 14696191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Integrating Bonded and Nonbonded Potentials in the Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein Structure Prediction.
    Wang X; Huang SY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):3080-3090. PubMed ID: 31045366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improving predicted protein loop structure ranking using a Pareto-optimality consensus method.
    Li Y; Rata I; Chiu SW; Jakobsson E
    BMC Struct Biol; 2010 Jul; 10():22. PubMed ID: 20642859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A homology/ab initio hybrid algorithm for sampling near-native protein conformations.
    Dhingra P; Jayaram B
    J Comput Chem; 2013 Aug; 34(22):1925-36. PubMed ID: 23728619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction.
    Tsai J; Bonneau R; Morozov AV; Kuhlman B; Rohl CA; Baker D
    Proteins; 2003 Oct; 53(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 12945051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficient identification of near-native conformations in ab initio protein structure prediction using structural profiles.
    Wolff K; Vendruscolo M; Porto M
    Proteins; 2010 Feb; 78(2):249-58. PubMed ID: 19701942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Protein structural model selection by combining consensus and single scoring methods.
    He Z; Alazmi M; Zhang J; Xu D
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74006. PubMed ID: 24023923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys.
    Park B; Levitt M
    J Mol Biol; 1996 May; 258(2):367-92. PubMed ID: 8627632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimized distance-dependent atom-pair-based potential DOOP for protein structure prediction.
    Chae MH; Krull F; Knapp EW
    Proteins; 2015 May; 83(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 25693513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Residue contacts predicted by evolutionary covariance extend the application of ab initio molecular replacement to larger and more challenging protein folds.
    Simkovic F; Thomas JM; Keegan RM; Winn MD; Mayans O; Rigden DJ
    IUCrJ; 2016 Jul; 3(Pt 4):259-70. PubMed ID: 27437113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fast structure similarity searches among protein models: efficient clustering of protein fragments.
    Fogolari F; Corazza A; Viglino P; Esposito G
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2012 May; 7(1):16. PubMed ID: 22642815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?
    Korb O; Ten Brink T; Victor Paul Raj FR; Keil M; Exner TE
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Feb; 26(2):185-97. PubMed ID: 22231069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Refinement of pairwise potentials via logistic regression to score protein-protein interactions.
    Tanemura KA; Pei J; Merz KM
    Proteins; 2020 Dec; 88(12):1559-1568. PubMed ID: 32729132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. High-accuracy protein model quality assessment using attention graph neural networks.
    Zhang P; Xia C; Shen HB
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Mar; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 36736352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Protein structure prediction by all-atom free-energy refinement.
    Verma A; Wenzel W
    BMC Struct Biol; 2007 Mar; 7():12. PubMed ID: 17371594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reliable Generation of Native-Like Decoys Limits Predictive Ability in Fragment-Based Protein Structure Prediction.
    Kandathil SM; Garza-Fabre M; Handl J; Lovell SC
    Biomolecules; 2019 Oct; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 31618996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ab initio modeling of small proteins by iterative TASSER simulations.
    Wu S; Skolnick J; Zhang Y
    BMC Biol; 2007 May; 5():17. PubMed ID: 17488521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. SVR_CAF: an integrated score function for detecting native protein structures among decoys.
    Zhou J; Yan W; Hu G; Shen B
    Proteins; 2014 Apr; 82(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 24115148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.