These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2332397)

  • 1. Genetic implications of a simulation model of litter size in swine based on ovulation rate, potential embryonic viability and uterine capacity: II. Simulated selection.
    Bennett GL; Leymaster KA
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Apr; 68(4):980-6. PubMed ID: 2332397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simulation model including ovulation rate, potential embryonic viability, and uterine capacity to explain litter size in mice: II. Responses to alternative criteria of selection.
    Ribeiro EL; Nielsen MK; Leymaster KA; Bennett GL
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Mar; 75(3):652-6. PubMed ID: 9078479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic implications of a simulation model of litter size in swine based on ovulation rate, potential embryonic viability and uterine capacity: I. Genetic theory.
    Bennett GL; Leymaster KA
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Apr; 68(4):969-79. PubMed ID: 2332396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integration of ovulation rate, potential embryonic viability and uterine capacity into a model of litter size in swine.
    Bennett GL; Leymaster KA
    J Anim Sci; 1989 May; 67(5):1230-41. PubMed ID: 2737980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simulation model including ovulation rate, potential embryonic viability, and uterine capacity to explain litter size in mice: I. Model development and implementation.
    Ribeiro EL; Nielsen MK; Bennett GL; Leymaster KA
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Mar; 75(3):641-51. PubMed ID: 9078478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in ovulation rate, uterine capacity, uterine dimensions, and parity effects with selection for litter size in swine.
    Gama LL; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Mar; 71(3):608-17. PubMed ID: 8463147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic implications of a bivariate threshold model for litter size components.
    Pérez-Enciso M; Foulley JL; Bodin L; Poivey JP
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Nov; 72(11):2775-86. PubMed ID: 7730169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uterine capacity and ovulation rate in mice selected 21 generations on alternative criteria to increase litter size.
    Clutter AC; Kirby YL; Nielsen MK
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Mar; 72(3):577-83. PubMed ID: 8181972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct responses to selection for increased litter size, decreased age at puberty, or random selection following selection for ovulation rate in swine.
    Lamberson WR; Johnson RK; Zimmerman DR; Long TE
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Aug; 69(8):3129-43. PubMed ID: 1894548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct and correlated responses to two-stage selection for ovulation rate and number of fully formed pigs at birth in swine.
    Ruíz-Flores A; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Sep; 79(9):2286-97. PubMed ID: 11583415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence of splayleg pigs in Nebraska litter size selection lines.
    Holl JW; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jan; 83(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 15583040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Responses in ovulation rate, embryonal survival, and litter traits in swine to 14 generations of selection to increase litter size.
    Johnson RK; Nielsen MK; Casey DS
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Mar; 77(3):541-57. PubMed ID: 10229349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alternative methods of selection for litter size in mice: I. Characterization of base population and development of methods.
    Clutter AC; Nielsen MK; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Nov; 68(11):3536-42. PubMed ID: 2262406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Divergent selection for uterine capacity in rabbits.
    Argente MJ; Santacreu MA; Climent A; Bolet G; Blasco A
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Sep; 75(9):2350-4. PubMed ID: 9303452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternative methods of selection for litter size in mice: II. Response to thirteen generations of selection.
    Gion JM; Clutter AC; Nielsen MK
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Nov; 68(11):3543-56. PubMed ID: 2262407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlated responses for litter traits to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs.
    Rosendo A; Druet T; Gogué J; Canario L; Bidanel JP
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1615-24. PubMed ID: 17371794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of 28 generations of selection for reproduction, growth, and carcass traits in swine.
    Hsu WL; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Nov; 92(11):4806-22. PubMed ID: 25349336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of plasma FSH concentration in boars and gilts from lines selected for ovulation rate and embryonal survival, and litter size and estimation of (co)variance components for FSH and ovulation rate.
    Cassady JP; Johnson RK; Ford JJ
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Jun; 78(6):1430-5. PubMed ID: 10875623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct responses to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in Large White pigs.
    Rosendo A; Druet T; Gogué J; Bidanel JP
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Feb; 85(2):356-64. PubMed ID: 17235020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of age, weight, and sire on embryo and fetal survival in sheep.
    Shorten PR; O'Connell AR; Demmers KJ; Edwards SJ; Cullen NG; Juengel JL
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4641-53. PubMed ID: 23942709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.