312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23324075)
1. Facial asymmetry index in normal young adults.
Huang CS; Liu XQ; Chen YR
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 May; 16(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 23324075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 2D and 3D analysis methods of facial asymmetry in comparison.
Berssenbrügge P; Berlin NF; Kebeck G; Runte C; Jung S; Kleinheinz J; Dirksen D
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):e327-34. PubMed ID: 24507934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of a Method for Computing Facial Symmetry Plane and Degree of Asymmetry Based on 3D-data.
Hartmann J; Meyer-Marcotty P; Benz M; Häusler G; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A
J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Nov; 68(6):477-90. PubMed ID: 18034288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry after mandibular reconstruction: validation of a new method using stereophotogrammetry.
Verhoeven TJ; Coppen C; Barkhuysen R; Bronkhorst EM; Merkx MA; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 22939875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A three-dimensional study of facial mimicry in healthy young adults.
Sforza C; Galante D; Shirai YF; Ferrario VF
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 38(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 19932974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between landmark and surface-based three-dimensional analyses of facial asymmetry in adults.
Alqattan M; Djordjevic J; Zhurov AI; Richmond S
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 24152377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of facial asymmetry in visual perception: a 3-dimensional data analysis.
Meyer-Marcotty P; Alpers GW; Gerdes AB; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):168.e1-8; discussion 168-9. PubMed ID: 20152669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new method for automatic tracking of facial landmarks in 3D motion captured images (4D).
Al-Anezi T; Khambay B; Peng MJ; O'Leary E; Ju X; Ayoub A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 23218511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Asymmetry index for the photogrammetric assessment of facial asymmetry.
Blasi A; Nucera R; Ronsivalle V; Candida E; Grippaudo C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Sep; 162(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 35562291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of sex and age on facial asymmetry in healthy subjects: a cross-sectional study from adolescence to mid-adulthood.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Ciusa V; Dellavia C; Tartaglia GM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Apr; 59(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 11289167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification of facial asymmetry by 2D analysis - A comparison of recent approaches.
Berlin NF; Berssenbrügge P; Runte C; Wermker K; Jung S; Kleinheinz J; Dirksen D
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 24041610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of facial asymmetry in growing subjects with a three-dimensional laser scanning system.
Primozic J; Perinetti G; Zhurov A; Richmond S; Ovsenik M
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2012 Nov; 15(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 23020694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of therapeutic effect of virtual design for correcting facial asymmetry of skeletal Class Ⅲ deformity].
Tian KY; Li QQ; Liu XJ; Wang XX; Li ZL; Wang X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 51(10):594-599. PubMed ID: 27719703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative 3D soft tissue analysis of symmetry prior to and after unilateral cleft lip repair compared with non-cleft persons (performed in Cambodia).
Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Chaitidis D; Berg-Boerner I; Krol Z; Kovacs L; Schwenzer NF; Zimmerer S; Holberg C; Zeilhofer HF
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 36(8):431-8. PubMed ID: 18701312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional perception of facial asymmetry.
Meyer-Marcotty P; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A; Bareis U; Hartmann J; Kochel J
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):647-53. PubMed ID: 21355063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of three methods to evaluate the position of an artificial ear on the deficient side of the face from a three-dimensional surface scan of patients with hemifacial microsomia.
Coward TJ; Watson RM; Richards R; Scott BJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 22371838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The normal-equivalent: a patient-specific assessment of facial harmony.
Claes P; Walters M; Gillett D; Vandermeulen D; Clement JG; Suetens P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 23582569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional analyses of facial soft tissue configuration of Japanese females with jaw deformity--a trial of polygonal view of facial soft tissue deformity in orthognathic patients.
Shimomatsu K; Nozoe E; Ishihata K; Okawachi T; Nakamura N
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 40(7):559-67. PubMed ID: 22078498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of smiling on facial asymmetry in adults: a 3D evaluation.
Darby LJ; Millett DT; Kelly N; McIntyre GT; Cronin MS
Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 26999885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
