These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23324533)

  • 1. A qualitative interview study exploring pregnant women's and health professionals' attitudes to external cephalic version.
    Say R; Thomson R; Robson S; Exley C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 Jan; 13():4. PubMed ID: 23324533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patients' and professionals' barriers and facilitators to external cephalic version for breech presentation at term, a qualitative analysis in the Netherlands.
    Rosman AN; Vlemmix F; Fleuren MA; Rijnders ME; Beuckens A; Opmeer BC; Mol BW; van Zwieten MC; Kok M
    Midwifery; 2014 Mar; 30(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 23664312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. This baby is not for turning: Women's experiences of attempted external cephalic version.
    Watts NP; Petrovska K; Bisits A; Catling C; Homer CS
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16(1):248. PubMed ID: 27561416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pregnant women's preferences and knowledge of term breech management, in an Australian setting.
    Raynes-Greenow CH; Roberts CL; Barratt A; Brodrick B; Peat B
    Midwifery; 2004 Jun; 20(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 15177862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Women's attitudes towards management of breech presentation at term.
    Caukwell S; Joels LA; Kyle PM; Mills MS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Sep; 22(5):486-8. PubMed ID: 12521413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Women's experiences of planning a vaginal breech birth in Australia.
    Homer CS; Watts NP; Petrovska K; Sjostedt CM; Bisits A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Apr; 15():89. PubMed ID: 25885035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementation of the external cephalic version in breech delivery. Dutch national implementation study of external cephalic version.
    Vlemmix F; Rosman AN; Fleuren MA; Rijnders ME; Beuckens A; Haak MC; Akerboom BM; Bais JM; Kuppens SM; Papatsonis DN; Opmeer BC; van der Post JA; Mol BW; Kok M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2010 May; 10():20. PubMed ID: 20459717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A survey of pregnant women's attitude towards breech delivery and external cephalic version.
    Leung TY; Lau TK; Lo KW; Rogers MS
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2000 Aug; 40(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 11065030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - External Cephalic Version and other Interventions to turn Breech Babies to Cephalic Presentation].
    Ducarme G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 31678503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Qualitative assessment of women's experiences with ECV.
    Menakaya UA; Trivedi A
    Women Birth; 2013 Mar; 26(1):e41-4. PubMed ID: 23062234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of external cephalic version for breech presentation at term: A national survey of Norwegian birth units.
    Pay ASD; Hetlebakke A; Glomsrød MP; Bøhn K; Blix E
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2022 Sep; 33():100751. PubMed ID: 35728346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changing attitudes toward mode of delivery and external cephalic version in breech presentations.
    Yogev Y; Horowitz E; Ben-Haroush A; Chen R; Kaplan B
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2002 Dec; 79(3):221-4. PubMed ID: 12445986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland.
    Wise MR; Sadler L; Ansell D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 19032661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002-2012.
    Bin YS; Roberts CL; Nicholl MC; Ford JB
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):244. PubMed ID: 28747173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Impact of the external cephalic version on the obstetrical prognosis in a team with a high success rate of vaginal delivery in breech presentation].
    Coppola C; Mottet N; Mariet AS; Baeza C; Poitrey E; Bourtembourg A; Ramanah R; Riethmuller D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Oct; 45(8):859-865. PubMed ID: 27125381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and pilot-testing of a decision aid for women with a breech-presenting baby.
    Nassar N; Roberts CL; Raynes-Greenow CH; Barratt A
    Midwifery; 2007 Mar; 23(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 16843575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. External cephalic version at term: a cohort study of 18 years' experience.
    Melo P; Georgiou EX; Hedditch A; Ellaway P; Impey L
    BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 30223309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women's Selection of Mode of Birth for their Breech Presentation.
    Wang XR; Cotter H; Fahey M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Jun; 43(6):716-720. PubMed ID: 33309018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [External cephalic version in case of persisting breech presentation at term: motivations and women's experience of the intervention].
    Pichon M; Guittier MJ; Irion O; Boulvain M
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2013; 41(7-8):427-32. PubMed ID: 23102577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version after a previous caesarean delivery: A systematic review.
    Zhang N; Ward H
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Oct; 61(5):650-657. PubMed ID: 34169515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.