These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23324885)

  • 1. Applying dynamic parameters to predict hemodynamic response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients with septic shock.
    Lanspa MJ; Grissom CK; Hirshberg EL; Jones JP; Brown SM
    Shock; 2013 Feb; 39(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 23324885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
    Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Variability of peripheral arterial peak velocity predicts fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
    Lu N; Jiang L; Zhu B; Han W; Zhao Y; Shi Y; Guo F; Xi X
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2018 Mar; 30(3):224-229. PubMed ID: 29519280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Central venous pressure and shock index predict lack of hemodynamic response to volume expansion in septic shock: a prospective, observational study.
    Lanspa MJ; Brown SM; Hirshberg EL; Jones JP; Grissom CK
    J Crit Care; 2012 Dec; 27(6):609-15. PubMed ID: 23084132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Plethysmographic variation index predicts fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients in the early phase of septic shock in the emergency department: a pilot study.
    Feissel M; Kalakhy R; Banwarth P; Badie J; Pavon A; Faller JP; Quenot JP
    J Crit Care; 2013 Oct; 28(5):634-9. PubMed ID: 23683565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A prospective clinical study of pleth variability index in prediction of volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
    Lu N; Zheng R; Lin H; Yu J; Shao J; Wu X; Wang H
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Jan; 27(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25591431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of VTILVOT variation rate on the assessment of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients.
    Wang J; Zhou D; Gao Y; Wu Z; Wang X; Lv C
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Nov; 99(47):e22702. PubMed ID: 33217793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring the best predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock.
    Lu N; Xi X; Jiang L; Yang D; Yin K
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1258-1261. PubMed ID: 28363617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of a superior vena cava collapsibility index measured with a miniaturized transoesophageal monoplane continuous echocardiography probe to predict fluid responsiveness compared to stroke volume variations in open major vascular surgery: a prospective cohort study.
    Bubenek-Turconi ŞI; Hendy A; Băilă S; Drăgan A; Chioncel O; Văleanu L; Moroșanu B; Iliescu VA
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Jun; 34(3):491-499. PubMed ID: 31278544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applying dynamic parameters to predict hemodynamic response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients with septic shock: reply.
    Lanspa MJ; Grissom CK; Hirshberg EL; Jones JP; Brown SM
    Shock; 2013 May; 39(5):462. PubMed ID: 23591562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applying dynamic parameters to predict hemodynamic response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients with septic shock: the eye cannot see what the mind does not know.
    Bloomstone JA; Nathanson BH; McGee WT
    Shock; 2013 May; 39(5):461-2. PubMed ID: 23591561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic Accuracy of the Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Patients With Sepsis and Acute Circulatory Failure.
    Preau S; Bortolotti P; Colling D; Dewavrin F; Colas V; Voisin B; Onimus T; Drumez E; Durocher A; Redheuil A; Saulnier F
    Crit Care Med; 2017 Mar; 45(3):e290-e297. PubMed ID: 27749318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.
    Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive Value of the Respiratory Variation in Inferior Vena Cava Diameter for Ventilated Children With Septic Shock.
    Xiong Z; Zhang G; Zhou Q; Lu B; Zheng X; Wu M; Qu Y
    Front Pediatr; 2022; 10():895651. PubMed ID: 35874570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Two Parameters for the Evaluation of Hypovolemia in Patients with Septic Shock: Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index (IVCCI), Delta Cardiac Output.
    Kaçar CK; Uzundere O; Yektaş A
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 Oct; 25():8105-8111. PubMed ID: 31659997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation.
    Perner A; Faber T
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 Oct; 50(9):1068-73. PubMed ID: 16939480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inferior vena cava diameter variation compared with pulse pressure variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis.
    Theerawit P; Morasert T; Sutherasan Y
    J Crit Care; 2016 Dec; 36():246-251. PubMed ID: 27591389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Respiratory Variation in Femoral Vein Diameter Has Moderate Accuracy as a Marker of Fluid Responsivity in Mechanically Ventilated Septic Shock Patients.
    Nedel WL; Simas DM; Marin LG; Morais VD; Friedman G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2713-2717. PubMed ID: 28756901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting preload responsiveness using simultaneous recordings of inferior and superior vena cavae diameters.
    Charbonneau H; Riu B; Faron M; Mari A; Kurrek MM; Ruiz J; Geeraerts T; Fourcade O; Genestal M; Silva S
    Crit Care; 2014 Sep; 18(5):473. PubMed ID: 25189403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Measurement of brachial artery velocity variation and inferior vena cava variability to estimate fluid responsiveness].
    Zhu W; Wan L; Wan X; Wang G; Su M; Liao G; Huang Q
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2016 Aug; 28(8):713-7. PubMed ID: 27434562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.