469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23324922)
1. Nationwide trends in the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Bae HW; Rajaee SS; Kanim LE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):916-26. PubMed ID: 23324922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. National Trends in the Surgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.
Al Jammal OM; Delavar A; Maguire KR; Hirshman BR; Wali AR; Kazzaz M; Pham MH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Dec; 44(23):E1369-E1378. PubMed ID: 31343618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reoperation and revision rates of 3 surgical treatment methods for lumbar stenosis associated with degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.
Brodke DS; Annis P; Lawrence BD; Woodbury AM; Daubs MD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):2287-94. PubMed ID: 24150428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical treatment patterns among Medicare beneficiaries newly diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Chen E; Tong KB; Laouri M
Spine J; 2010 Jul; 10(7):588-94. PubMed ID: 20381431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease: nationwide cohort study.
Kim CH; Chung CK; Park CS; Choi B; Kim MJ; Park BJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(7):581-90. PubMed ID: 23023591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mid-term changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment in lumbar spinal stenosis with coexisting degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery: minimum five-year follow-up.
Salimi H; Toyoda H; Terai H; Yamada K; Hoshino M; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Tamai K; Hori Y; Yabu A; Nakamura H
Spine J; 2022 May; 22(5):819-826. PubMed ID: 34813957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study.
Kim CH; Chung CK; Park CS; Choi B; Hahn S; Kim MJ; Lee KS; Park BJ
Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1230-7. PubMed ID: 24017959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Epidemiological trends in the utilization of bone morphogenetic protein in spinal fusions from 2002 to 2011.
Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(6):491-6. PubMed ID: 24365905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Readmission rates after decompression surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis among Medicare beneficiaries.
Modhia U; Takemoto S; Braid-Forbes MJ; Weber M; Berven SH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(7):591-6. PubMed ID: 23324923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity.
Kelleher MO; Timlin M; Persaud O; Rampersaud YR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E981-7. PubMed ID: 20386501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers.
Sears W
Spine J; 2005; 5(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 15749617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. National trends in the use of fusion techniques to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Kepler CK; Vaccaro AR; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Rihn JA; Albert TJ; Radcliff KE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(19):1584-9. PubMed ID: 24979276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgery for spinal stenosis: long-term reoperation rates, health care cost, and impact of instrumentation.
Lad SP; Babu R; Ugiliweneza B; Patil CG; Boakye M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(12):978-87. PubMed ID: 24718058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends in isolated lumbar spinal stenosis surgery among working US adults aged 40-64 years, 2010-2014.
Raad M; Donaldson CJ; El Dafrawy MH; Sciubba DM; Riley LH; Neuman BJ; Kebaish KM; Skolasky RL
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Aug; 29(2):169-175. PubMed ID: 29799337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lytic spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers.
Sears W
Spine J; 2005; 5(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 15749616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis.
Elowitz EH; Yanni DS; Chwajol M; Starke RM; Perin NI
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Oct; 54(5-6):201-6. PubMed ID: 22278781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perioperative outcomes, complications, and costs associated with lumbar spinal fusion in older patients with spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis.
Ong KL; Auerbach JD; Lau E; Schmier J; Ochoa JA
Neurosurg Focus; 2014 Jun; 36(6):E5. PubMed ID: 24881637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The necessity and risk factors of subsequent fusion after decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5 years follow-up in two different large populations.
Urakawa H; Jones T; Samuel A; Vaishnav AS; Othman Y; Virk S; Katsuura Y; Iyer S; McAnany S; Albert T; Gang CH; Qureshi SA
Spine J; 2020 Oct; 20(10):1566-1572. PubMed ID: 32417500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Rates of LSS Surgery in Norwegian Public Hospitals: A Threefold Increase From 1999 to 2013.
Grøvle L; Fjeld OR; Haugen AJ; Helgeland J; Småstuen MC; Solberg TK; Zwart JA; Grotle M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Mar; 44(6):E372-E378. PubMed ID: 30234811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
