246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23324934)
21. Impact of age on the likelihood of reaching a minimum clinically important difference in 374 three-column spinal osteotomies: clinical article.
Scheer JK; Lafage V; Smith JS; Deviren V; Hostin R; McCarthy IM; Mundis GM; Burton DC; Klineberg E; Gupta MC; Kebaish KM; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Schwab F; Ames CP;
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Mar; 20(3):306-12. PubMed ID: 24405466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Johnson JR; Puno RM; Campbell MJ
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 18805059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The safety and efficacy of OP-1 (rhBMP-7) as a replacement for iliac crest autograft for posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis: minimum 4-year follow-up of a pilot study.
Vaccaro AR; Whang PG; Patel T; Phillips FM; Anderson DG; Albert TJ; Hilibrand AS; Brower RS; Kurd MF; Appannagari A; Patel M; Fischgrund JS
Spine J; 2008; 8(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 17588821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes.
Crandall DG; Revella J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):2126-33. PubMed ID: 19752698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Depressive burden in the preoperative and early recovery phase predicts poorer surgery outcome among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a one-year prospective follow-up study.
Sinikallio S; Aalto T; Airaksinen O; Herno A; Kröger H; Viinamäki H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2573-8. PubMed ID: 19927107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Changes in the Oswestry Disability Index that predict improvement after lumbar fusion.
Djurasovic M; Glassman SD; Dimar JR; Crawford CH; Bratcher KR; Carreon LY
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Nov; 17(5):486-90. PubMed ID: 22998402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Spine patients demystified: what are the predictive factors of poor surgical outcome in patients after elective cervical and lumbar spine surgery?
Jiménez-Almonte JH; Hautala GS; Abbenhaus EJ; Grabau JD; Nzegwu IN; Mehdi SK; Akhtar ZM; Liu B; Jacobs CA; Cassidy RC
Spine J; 2020 Oct; 20(10):1529-1534. PubMed ID: 32502658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Revision spinal fusion in patients older than 75: is it worth the risks?
Chang MS; Chang YH; Revella J; Crandall DG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(1):E35-9. PubMed ID: 24150430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The early changes in trunk muscle strength and disability following lumbar spine fusion.
Tarnanen S; Neva MH; Kautiainen H; Ylinen J; Pekkanen L; Kaistila T; Vuorenmaa M; Häkkinen A
Disabil Rehabil; 2013 Jan; 35(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 22671313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF) for the treatment of localised segment degeneration of lumbar spine].
Kunze B; Drasseck T; Kluba T
Z Orthop Unfall; 2011 Jun; 149(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 21341184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with rhBMP-2 in spinal deformity, spondylolisthesis, and degenerative disease--part 1: Large series diagnosis related outcomes and complications with 2- to 9-year follow-up.
Crandall DG; Revella J; Patterson J; Huish E; Chang M; McLemore R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):1128-36. PubMed ID: 23370679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases.
Lee JC; Jang HD; Shin BJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(18):1548-57. PubMed ID: 22426447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Preoperative Zung depression scale predicts patient satisfaction independent of the extent of improvement after revision lumbar surgery.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Bydon A; Cheng JS; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 23422730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Changes in vitamin D status after surgery in female patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and its clinical significance.
Kim TH; Yoon JY; Lee BH; Jung HS; Park MS; Park JO; Moon ES; Kim HS; Lee HM; Moon SH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(21):E1326-30. PubMed ID: 22805343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis.
Glassman SD; Copay AG; Berven SH; Polly DW; Subach BR; Carreon LY
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1839-47. PubMed ID: 18762642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Outcome of lumbar arthrodesis in patients sixty-five years of age or older.
Glassman SD; Polly DW; Bono CM; Burkus K; Dimar JR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Apr; 91(4):783-90. PubMed ID: 19339561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prognostic factors for surgical outcomes including preoperative total knee replacement and knee osteoarthritis status in female patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Ho Lee B; Kim TH; Chong HS; Lee SH; Park JO; Kim HS; Shim DW; Lee HM; Moon SH
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Mar; 28(2):47-52. PubMed ID: 23563328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Minimum Three-year Follow-up of Specific Functional Disabilities After Multilevel Lumbar Fusion: Comparison of Long-level and Short-level Fusion.
Park JS; Lee CS; Park SJ; Lee KJ; Yum TH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Oct; 44(20):1418-1425. PubMed ID: 31095118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
