These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23325781)

  • 1. A comparison of six statistical distributions for analysis of chromosome aberration data for radiation biodosimetry.
    Ainsbury EA; Vinnikov VA; Maznyk NA; Lloyd DC; Rothkamm K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jul; 155(3):253-67. PubMed ID: 23325781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CytoBayesJ: software tools for Bayesian analysis of cytogenetic radiation dosimetry data.
    Ainsbury EA; Vinnikov V; Puig P; Maznyk N; Rothkamm K; Lloyd DC
    Mutat Res; 2013 Aug; 756(1-2):184-91. PubMed ID: 23792213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Review of Bayesian statistical analysis methods for cytogenetic radiation biodosimetry, with a practical example.
    Ainsbury EA; Vinnikov VA; Puig P; Higueras M; Maznyk NA; Lloyd DC; Rothkamm K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Dec; 162(3):185-96. PubMed ID: 24282320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. radir package: an R implementation for cytogenetic biodosimetry dose estimation.
    Moriña D; Higueras M; Puig P; Ainsbury EA; Rothkamm K
    J Radiol Prot; 2015 Sep; 35(3):557-69. PubMed ID: 26160852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chromosomal biodosimetry by unfolding a mixed Poisson distribution: a generalized model.
    Sasaki MS
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2003 Feb; 79(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 12569012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dose estimation software for radiation biodosimetry.
    Ainsbury EA; Lloyd DC
    Health Phys; 2010 Feb; 98(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 20065696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cytogenetic research after accidental radiation exposure.
    Bauchinger M
    Stem Cells; 1995 May; 13 Suppl 1():182-90. PubMed ID: 7488944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of chromosome damage for biodosimetry using imaging flow cytometry.
    Beaton LA; Ferrarotto C; Kutzner BC; McNamee JP; Bellier PV; Wilkins RC
    Mutat Res; 2013 Aug; 756(1-2):192-5. PubMed ID: 23618924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A note on Poisson goodness-of-fit tests for ionizing radiation induced chromosomal aberration samples.
    Higueras M; González JE; Di Giorgio M; Barquinero JF
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2018 Jul; 94(7):656-663. PubMed ID: 29775402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Issues in cytogenetic biological dosimetry: emphasis on radiation environments in space.
    Straume T; Bender MA
    Radiat Res; 1997 Nov; 148(5 Suppl):S60-70. PubMed ID: 9355858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods.
    Léonard A; Rueff J; Gerber GB; Léonard ED
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):448-54. PubMed ID: 16381765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biodosimetry for high dose accidental exposures by drug induced premature chromosome condensation (PCC) assay.
    Balakrishnan S; Shirsath K; Bhat N; Anjaria K
    Mutat Res; 2010 Jun; 699(1-2):11-6. PubMed ID: 20338261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Zero-inflated regression models for radiation-induced chromosome aberration data: A comparative study.
    Oliveira M; Einbeck J; Higueras M; Ainsbury E; Puig P; Rothkamm K
    Biom J; 2016 Mar; 58(2):259-79. PubMed ID: 26461836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Foundations of identifying individual chromosomes by imaging flow cytometry with applications in radiation biodosimetry.
    Beaton-Green LA; Rodrigues MA; Lachapelle S; Wilkins RC
    Methods; 2017 Jan; 112():18-24. PubMed ID: 27524557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cytogenetic follow-up of some highly irradiated victims of the Chernobyl accident.
    Sevan'kaev AV; Lloyd DC; Edwards AA; Khvostunov IK; Mikhailova GF; Golub EV; Shepel NN; Nadejina NM; Galstian IA; Nugis VY; Barrios L; Caballin MR; Barquinero JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 15572397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Biological indication and dosimetry of unstable chromosome aberration frequencies in human lymphocytes].
    Baryliak IR; D'omina EA
    Tsitol Genet; 2004; 38(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 15098451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiation Dose Estimation by Automated Cytogenetic Biodosimetry.
    Rogan PK; Li Y; Wilkins RC; Flegal FN; Knoll JH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Dec; 172(1-3):207-217. PubMed ID: 27412514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Limitations associated with analysis of cytogenetic data for biological dosimetry.
    Vinnikov VA; Ainsbury EA; Maznyk NA; Lloyd DC; Rothkamm K
    Radiat Res; 2010 Oct; 174(4):403-14. PubMed ID: 20726714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biodosimetry using chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes.
    Senthamizhchelvan S; Pant GS; Rath GK; Julka PK; Nair O; Joshi RC; Malhotra A; Pandey RM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 16954150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cytogenetic methods for biodosimetry and risk individualisation after exposure to ionising radiation.
    Terzoudi GI; Pantelias GE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):513-20. PubMed ID: 17169946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.