These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2332725)
1. Discrimination training of mirror-image stimuli with a delayed-prompt technique: some critical dimensions of extra-stimulus prompts. Smeets PM; Striefel S J Exp Child Psychol; 1990 Apr; 49(2):275-99. PubMed ID: 2332725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Time-delay discrimination training: replication with different stimuli and different populations. Smeets PM; Striefel S; Hoogeveen FR Res Dev Disabil; 1990; 11(2):217-40. PubMed ID: 2374839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. S+ versus S- fading in teaching visual discriminations to severely mentally handicapped children. Strand SC J Ment Defic Res; 1989 Aug; 33 ( Pt 4)():283-99. PubMed ID: 2769740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Some detrimental effects of using extra stimuli to guide learning in normal and autistic children. Koegel RL; Rincover A J Abnorm Child Psychol; 1976; 4(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 1270699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of different stimulus manipulations of the acquisition of word recognition in trainable mentally retarded children. Smeets PM; Lancioni GE; Hoogeveen FR J Ment Defic Res; 1984 Jun; 28 ( Pt 2)():109-22. PubMed ID: 6748056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stimulus generalization following extra-dimensional training in educationally subnormal (severely) children. Hogg J; Evans PL Br J Psychol; 1975 May; 66(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 1156743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting on discrimination learning in autistic children. Schreibman L J Appl Behav Anal; 1975; 8(1):91-112. PubMed ID: 1141084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stimulus equalization: temporary reduction of stimulus complexity to facilitate discrimination learning. Hoko JA; LeBlanc JM Res Dev Disabil; 1988; 9(3):255-75. PubMed ID: 3175093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Emergent simple discrimination in children: transfer of stimulus control under non-reinforced conditions. Smeets PM Q J Exp Psychol B; 1991 Nov; 43(4):361-88. PubMed ID: 1771242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An analysis of emergent simple discrimination in children. Boelens H; Smeets P Q J Exp Psychol B; 1990 May; 42(2):135-52. PubMed ID: 2367687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time-delay discrimination training with impulsive children: self-monitoring nonwait responses and the dimensions of prompts. Smeets PM; Striefel S J Abnorm Child Psychol; 1988 Dec; 16(6):693-706. PubMed ID: 3216077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Age differences and similarities in the effects of cues and prompts. Hartley AA; Kieley JM; Slabach EH J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):523-37. PubMed ID: 2144568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Children's performance in mental rotation tasks: orientation-free features flatten the slope. Perrucci V; Agnoli F; Albiero P Dev Sci; 2008 Sep; 11(5):732-42. PubMed ID: 18801129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Children's memory for orientation in the absence of external cues. Fisher CB Child Dev; 1979 Dec; 50(4):1088-92. PubMed ID: 535432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attentional tradeoffs in the pigeon. Vyazovska OV; Teng Y; Wasserman EA J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):337-54. PubMed ID: 24634281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Why are artificial polymorphous concepts so hard for birds to learn? Lea SE; Wills AJ; Ryan CM Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):251-67. PubMed ID: 16618633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inhibition of return for target discriminations: the effect of repeating discriminated and irrelevant stimulus dimensions. Taylor TL; Donnelly MP Percept Psychophys; 2002 Feb; 64(2):292-317. PubMed ID: 12013382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]