228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23327843)
1. A biomechanical study of two different pedicle screw methods for fixation in osteoporotic and nonosteoporotic vertebrae.
Higashino K; Kim JH; Horton WC; Hutton WC
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2012; 21(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 23327843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws.
Zhuang XM; Yu BS; Zheng ZM; Zhang JF; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E925-31. PubMed ID: 20098349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characteristics of immediate and fatigue strength of a dual-threaded pedicle screw in cadaveric spines.
Brasiliense LB; Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Turner JL; Crandall DG; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):947-56. PubMed ID: 23602373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical Fixation Properties of the Cortical Bone Trajectory in the Osteoporotic Lumbar Spine.
Li HM; Zhang RJ; Gao H; Jia CY; Xing T; Zhang JX; Dong FL; Shen CL
World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e717-e727. PubMed ID: 30092463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Krag versus Caudad trajectory technique for pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical comparison and analysis.
Yuan Q; Han X; Han X; He D; Liu B; Tian W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Dec; 39(26 Spec No.):B27-35. PubMed ID: 25504099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of screw augmentation in posterior dynamic and rigid stabilization systems in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: a biomechanical cadaveric study.
Hoppe S; Loosli Y; Baumgartner D; Heini P; Benneker L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(6):E384-9. PubMed ID: 24384660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of pilot hole preparation technique on pedicle screw fixation in different regions of the osteoporotic thoracic and lumbar spine.
Carmouche JJ; Molinari RW; Gerlinger T; Devine J; Patience T
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Nov; 3(5):364-70. PubMed ID: 16302630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of cannulated pedicle screws for fixation in osteoporotic spines and comparison of its clinical results and biomechanical characteristics with the needle injection method.
Chang MC; Kao HC; Ying SH; Liu CL
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Aug; 26(6):305-15. PubMed ID: 23887077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pedicle screws can be 4 times stronger than lateral mass screws for insertion in the midcervical spine: a biomechanical study on strength of fixation.
Ito Z; Higashino K; Kato S; Kim SS; Wong E; Yoshioka K; Hutton WC
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Apr; 27(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22373932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A biomechanical evaluation of three revision screw strategies for failed lateral mass fixation.
Hostin RA; Wu C; Perra JH; Polly DW; Akesen B; Wroblewski JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2415-21. PubMed ID: 18923316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Straight-forward versus anatomic trajectory technique of thoracic pedicle screw fixation: a biomechanical analysis.
Lehman RA; Polly DW; Kuklo TR; Cunningham B; Kirk KL; Belmont PJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Sep; 28(18):2058-65. PubMed ID: 14501914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A bicortical pedicle screw in the caudad trajectory is the best option for the fixation of an osteoporotic vertebra: An in-vitro experimental study using synthetic lumbar osteoporotic bone models.
Shibasaki Y; Tsutsui S; Yamamoto E; Murakami K; Yoshida M; Yamada H
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Feb; 72():150-154. PubMed ID: 31877533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical Investigation of a Novel Revision Device in an Osteoporotic Model: Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screw Anchor Versus Larger Screw Diameter.
Manon J; Hussain MM; Harris J; Moldavsky M; La Marca F; Bucklen BS
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):265-271. PubMed ID: 28632549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tapping insertional torque allows prediction for better pedicle screw fixation and optimal screw size selection.
Helgeson MD; Kang DG; Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE; Luhmann SJ
Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):957-65. PubMed ID: 23602374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enhancing percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with hydroxyapatite granules: A biomechanical study using an osteoporotic bone model.
Kanno H; Aizawa T; Hashimoto K; Itoi E
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0223106. PubMed ID: 31557234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of pedicle screw diameter on screw fixation efficacy in human osteoporotic thoracic vertebrae.
Lai DM; Shih YT; Chen YH; Chien A; Wang JL
J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():196-203. PubMed ID: 29126607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revision of cannulated and perforated cement-augmented pedicle screws: a biomechanical study in human cadavers.
Bullmann V; Schmoelz W; Richter M; Grathwohl C; Schulte TL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E932-9. PubMed ID: 20508553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The biomechanical effect of pedicle screw hubbing on pullout resistance in the thoracic spine.
Paik H; Dmitriev AE; Lehman RA; Gaume RE; Ambati DV; Kang DG; Lenke LG
Spine J; 2012 May; 12(5):417-24. PubMed ID: 22480532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
