These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1039 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23328192)
1. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach. Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses. Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses. Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths. Bevilacqua M; Tealdo T; Pera F; Menini M; Mossolov A; Drago C; Pera P Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 19149073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone. Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study. Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Silva GC; Mendonça JA; Lopes LR; Landre J Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20369081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of dental and zygomatic implants on stress distribution in maxillary defects: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis study. Korkmaz FM; Korkmaz YT; Yaluğ S; Korkmaz T J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):557-67. PubMed ID: 20925533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis. Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA; Geramy A; Yaghobee S; Khorsand A; Yousefifakhr H; Rokn A; Soolari A J Int Acad Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26233968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis. Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of the rigidity of a provisional restoration supported on four immediately loaded implants in the edentulous maxilla on biomechanical bone-implant interactions under simulated bruxism conditions: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Yamaguchi K; Ishiura Y; Tanaka S; Baba K Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):442-50. PubMed ID: 25191887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The biomechanical analysis of relative position between implant and alveolar bone: finite element method. Huang CC; Lan TH; Lee HE; Wang CH J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):489-96. PubMed ID: 20936917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different implant configurations for a mandibular fixed prosthesis. Fazi G; Tellini S; Vangi D; Branchi R Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):752-9. PubMed ID: 21841984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures. Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants. Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis. Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]