BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23329309)

  • 1. Driving with central field loss I: effect of central scotomas on responses to hazards.
    Bronstad PM; Bowers AR; Albu A; Goldstein R; Peli E
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 131(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 23329309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Driving with Central Visual Field Loss II: How Scotomas above or below the Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL) Affect Hazard Detection in a Driving Simulator.
    Bronstad PM; Albu A; Bowers AR; Goldstein R; Peli E
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136517. PubMed ID: 26332315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effects of Age, Distraction, and Simulated Central Vision Impairment on Hazard Detection in a Driving Simulator.
    Zhang CT; Bowers AR; Savage SW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Apr; 97(4):239-248. PubMed ID: 32304533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a Paradigm to Investigate Detection of Road Hazards when Using a Bioptic Telescope.
    Bowers AR; Bronstad PM; Spano LP; Huq B; Tang X; Doherty A; Peli E; Luo G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Sep; 95(9):785-794. PubMed ID: 29863502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Driving with hemianopia: III. Detection of stationary and approaching pedestrians in a simulator.
    Alberti CF; Peli E; Bowers AR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Jan; 55(1):368-74. PubMed ID: 24346175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual attention measures predict pedestrian detection in central field loss: a pilot study.
    Alberti CF; Horowitz T; Bronstad PM; Bowers AR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89381. PubMed ID: 24558495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characteristics of the preferred retinal loci of better and worse seeing eyes of patients with a central scotoma.
    Kisilevsky E; Tarita-Nistor L; González EG; Mandelcorn MS; Brent MH; Markowitz SN; Steinbach MJ
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 51(5):362-367. PubMed ID: 27769327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient awareness of binocular central scotoma in age-related macular degeneration.
    Fletcher DC; Schuchard RA; Renninger LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Sep; 89(9):1395-8. PubMed ID: 22863789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Central visual field loss and driving--reply.
    Bronstad PM; Bowers AR; Albu A; Goldstein RB; Peli E
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Jun; 131(6):819-21. PubMed ID: 23764712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Central visual field loss and driving.
    Desapriya E; Hewapathirane DS; Pike I
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Jun; 131(6):819-21. PubMed ID: 23764711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast Sensitivity in Eyes with Central Scotoma: Effect of Stimulus Drift.
    Lewis P; Venkataraman AP; Lundström L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Apr; 95(4):354-361. PubMed ID: 29561506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Driving with central field loss.
    Legge GE
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 131(3):393-5. PubMed ID: 23329348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual rehabilitation using microperimetric acoustic biofeedback training in individuals with central scotoma.
    Ratra D; Gopalakrishnan S; Dalan D; Ratra V; Damkondwar D; Laxmi G
    Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):172-179. PubMed ID: 30253443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Volume perimetry: measurement in depth of visual field loss.
    Satgunam P; Apfelbaum HL; Peli E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Sep; 89(9):E1265-75. PubMed ID: 22922780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binocular Inhibition of Reading in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2.
    Tzaridis S; Herrmann P; Charbel Issa P; Degli Esposti S; Wagner SK; Fruttiger M; Egan C; Rubin G; Holz FG; Heeren TFC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2019 Sep; 60(12):3835-3841. PubMed ID: 31529080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rehabilitative approach in patients with ring scotoma.
    Amore FM; Silvestri V; Turco S; De Rossi F; Cruciani F
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):420-6. PubMed ID: 24093190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing the fixational and functional preferred retinal location in a pointing task.
    Sullivan B; Walker L
    Vision Res; 2015 Nov; 116(Pt A):68-79. PubMed ID: 26440864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual stabilization of posture in persons with central visual field loss.
    Turano KA; Dagnelie G; Herdman SJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jul; 37(8):1483-91. PubMed ID: 8675390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in eye movement parameters in the presence of an artificial central scotoma.
    Léné P; Ouerfelli-Ethier J; Fournet R; Laurin AS; Gosselin F; Khan AZ
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2020; 38(3):203-222. PubMed ID: 32675431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective Analysis of Performance of Activities of Daily Living in People With Central Field Loss.
    Pardhan S; Latham K; Tabrett D; Timmis MA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Nov; 56(12):7169-78. PubMed ID: 26540655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.