These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23330329)

  • 1. [Cost-effectiveness of a TLC-NOSF polyurethane foam dressing].
    Arroyo Ana A; Alvarez Vázquez JC; Blasco García C; Bermejo Martínez M; López Casanova P; Cuesta Cuesta JJ; De Haro Fernández F; Mateo Marín E; Segovia Gómez T; Villar Rojas AE
    Rev Enferm; 2012 Nov; 35(11):27-32. PubMed ID: 23330329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Clinical cases about the therapeutic use of debriding dressing hidrodetersive polyacrylate fibers with TLC and foam dressings TLC-NOSF polyurethane in chronic wounds].
    Blasco García C; Segovia Gómez T; Bermejo Martínez M; Cuesta Cuesta JJ; Alventosa Cortés AM
    Rev Enferm; 2012 Oct; 35(10):9-14. PubMed ID: 23157065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of life in patients with leg ulcers: results from CHALLENGE, a double-blind randomised controlled trial.
    Meaume S; Dompmartin A; Lok C; Lazareth I; Sigal M; Truchetet F; Sauvadet A; Bohbot S;
    J Wound Care; 2017 Jul; 26(7):368-379. PubMed ID: 28704156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France.
    Maunoury F; Oury A; Fortin S; Thomassin L; Bohbot S;
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245652. PubMed ID: 33481840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multilayer polyurethane foam dressing for pressure ulcer prevention in older hip fracture patients: an economic evaluation.
    Forni C; Searle R
    J Wound Care; 2020 Feb; 29(2):120-127. PubMed ID: 32058851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.
    Payne WG; Posnett J; Alvarez O; Brown-Etris M; Jameson G; Wolcott R; Dharma H; Hartwell S; Ochs D
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Feb; 55(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19246785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of polyabsorbent TLC-NOSF dressings on chronic wounds: a prospective, observational, multicentre study of 1140 patients.
    Dissemond J; Lützkendorf S; Dietlein M; Neßeler I; Becker E; Möller U; Thomassin L; Bohbot S; Münter KC
    J Wound Care; 2020 Jun; 29(6):350-361. PubMed ID: 32530781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of treating vascular leg ulcers with UrgoStart(®) and UrgoCell(®) Contact.
    Augustin M; Herberger K; Kroeger K; Muenter KC; Goepel L; Rychlik R
    Int Wound J; 2016 Feb; 13(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 24618370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative cost-effectiveness of four-layer bandaging in the treatment of venous leg ulceration.
    Carr L; Philips Z; Posnett J
    J Wound Care; 1999 May; 8(5):243-8. PubMed ID: 10531939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The effect on wound healing of venous leg ulcers of a two-layered polyurethane foam wound dressing].
    Pessenhofer H; Stangl M
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1989 Sep; 39(9):1173-7. PubMed ID: 2590272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of TLC-sucrose octasulfate versus control dressings in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.
    Lobmann R; Augustin M; Lawall H; Tigges W; Potempa C; Thiem H; Fietz C; Rychlik RP
    J Wound Care; 2019 Dec; 28(12):808-816. PubMed ID: 31825772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Leg ulcer treatment in hospital and primary care in Sweden: cost-effective care and quality of life.
    Lindholm C
    Adv Wound Care; 1995; 8(5):48, 50, 52. PubMed ID: 7582337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effective managed care: gel versus wet-to-dry for debridement.
    Mulder GD
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Mar; 41(2):68-70, 72, 74 passim. PubMed ID: 7598779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Venous leg ulcers managed using polyurethane foam with a micropore dressing: two case reports.
    Nair HKR
    J Wound Care; 2018 Sep; 27(Sup9a):S37-S40. PubMed ID: 30207848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Economic analysis of VenUS I, a randomized trial of two bandages for treating venous leg ulcers.
    Iglesias CP; Nelson EA; Cullum N; Torgerson DJ;
    Br J Surg; 2004 Oct; 91(10):1300-6. PubMed ID: 15382101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized, controlled, double-blind prospective trial with a Lipido-Colloid Technology-Nano-OligoSaccharide Factor wound dressing in the local management of venous leg ulcers.
    Meaume S; Truchetet F; Cambazard F; Lok C; Debure C; Dalac S; Lazareth I; Sigal ML; Sauvadet A; Bohbot S; Dompmartin A;
    Wound Repair Regen; 2012; 20(4):500-11. PubMed ID: 22681551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost effectiveness of community leg ulcer clinics. Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of compression bandages should be shown.
    Franks PJ; Moffatt CJ
    BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7165):1080-1. PubMed ID: 9841044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The cost-effectiveness of high compression.
    Torgerson DJ; Nelson EA
    J Wound Care; 1999 May; 8(5):215. PubMed ID: 10531933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Skin wound granulation from contact with synthetic foil of teflon-polyurethane type].
    Gollnick H; Kuhn C; Schnitker R; Stüttgen G
    Hautarzt; 1977 Oct; 28(10):535-8. PubMed ID: 599015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost effectiveness of community leg ulcer clinic. Study's comparison was outdated.
    Platt JC
    BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7165):1080. PubMed ID: 9841042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.