These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2333054)

  • 21. A new phantom for mammography.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Feb; 64(758):116-20. PubMed ID: 2004202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
    Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An anthropomorphic phantom for periodontal radiography.
    Visser H; Hermann KP; Pfeiffer T; Umlauf J; Krüger W; Harder D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 8617395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [A comparison between traditional mammography and digital with storage phosphors].
    Lambruschi G; Tagliagambe A; Palla L; Torri T; D'Alessandro F; Pastori R; Barbieri L
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 8480050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantitative contrast-enhanced mammography for contrast medium kinetics studies.
    Arvanitis CD; Speller R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6041-64. PubMed ID: 19779213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An anthropomorphic ultrasound breast phantom containing intermediate-sized scatterers.
    Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; Frank GR
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1982; 8(4):381-92. PubMed ID: 7112724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography.
    Chen X; Nishikawa RM; Chan ST; Lau BA; Zhang L; Mou X
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111919. PubMed ID: 24320452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dual-energy approach to contrast-enhanced mammography using the balanced filter method: spectral optimization and preliminary phantom measurement.
    Saito M
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4236-46. PubMed ID: 18072488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How does c-view image quality compare with conventional 2D FFDM?
    Nelson JS; Wells JR; Baker JA; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2538. PubMed ID: 27147364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Phantom study to evaluate contrast-medium-enhanced digital subtraction mammography with a full-field indirect-detection system.
    Palma BA; Rosado-Méndez I; Villaseñor Y; Brandan ME
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):577-89. PubMed ID: 20229866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Practical application of a scan-rotate equalization geometry to mammography.
    Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
    Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1987-96. PubMed ID: 8994163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the quantitative accuracy of a commercially available positron emission mammography scanner.
    Springer A; Mawlawi OR
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2132-9. PubMed ID: 21626946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Scatter correction in digital mammography based on image deconvolution.
    Ducote JL; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):1295-309. PubMed ID: 20134081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the detectability of breast cancer lesions using a modified anthropomorphic phantom.
    Doshi NK; Basic M; Cherry SR
    J Nucl Med; 1998 Nov; 39(11):1951-7. PubMed ID: 9829588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Direct digital mammography using a scanned-slot CCD imaging system.
    Yaffe MJ
    Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 8302210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Scattered radiation in scanning slot mammography.
    Jing Z; Huda W; Walker JK
    Med Phys; 1998 Jul; 25(7 Pt 1):1111-7. PubMed ID: 9682196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. WAXS fat subtraction model to estimate differential linear scattering coefficients of fatless breast tissue: phantom materials evaluation.
    Tang RY; Laamanen C; McDonald N; LeClair RJ
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):053501. PubMed ID: 24784407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results.
    Parker MS; Kelleher NM; Hoots JA; Chung JK; Fatouros PP; Benedict SH
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 18275868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.