BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23330660)

  • 21. Importance of molecular computer modeling in anticancer drug development.
    Geromichalos GD
    J BUON; 2007 Sep; 12 Suppl 1():S101-18. PubMed ID: 17935268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of assay technology as applied to safety assessment in reducing compound attrition in drug discovery.
    Thomas CE; Will Y
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2012 Feb; 7(2):109-22. PubMed ID: 22468913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Non-stoichiometric inhibition in integrated lead finding - a literature review.
    Klumpp M
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2016; 11(2):149-62. PubMed ID: 26653534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How to Prepare a Compound Collection Prior to Virtual Screening.
    Bologa CG; Ursu O; Oprea TI
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1939():119-138. PubMed ID: 30848459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Role of computer-aided drug design in modern drug discovery.
    Macalino SJ; Gosu V; Hong S; Choi S
    Arch Pharm Res; 2015 Sep; 38(9):1686-701. PubMed ID: 26208641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Advancing fragment binders to lead-like compounds using ligand and protein-based NMR spectroscopy.
    Maurer T
    Methods Enzymol; 2011; 493():469-85. PubMed ID: 21371602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Virtual screening of compound libraries.
    Cerqueira NM; Sousa SF; Fernandes PA; Ramos MJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 572():57-70. PubMed ID: 20694685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Virtual screening for lead discovery.
    Tang YT; Marshall GR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 716():1-22. PubMed ID: 21318897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of computational methods in the identification of bioactive compounds.
    Glick M; Jacoby E
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2011 Aug; 15(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 21411361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The importance of employing computational resources for the automation of drug discovery.
    Rosales-Hernández MC; Correa-Basurto J
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2015 Mar; 10(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 25682781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using computational techniques in fragment-based drug discovery.
    Desjarlais RL
    Methods Enzymol; 2011; 493():137-55. PubMed ID: 21371590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. High-throughput screening and structure-based approaches to hit discovery: is there a clear winner?
    Jhoti H; Rees S; Solari R
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2013 Dec; 8(12):1449-53. PubMed ID: 24206191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Small-world phenomena in chemical library networks: application to fragment-based drug discovery.
    Tanaka N; Ohno K; Niimi T; Moritomo A; Mori K; Orita M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2677-86. PubMed ID: 19961207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Novel inhibitor discovery through virtual screening against multiple protein conformations generated via ligand-directed modeling: a maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase example.
    Mahasenan KV; Li C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May; 52(5):1345-55. PubMed ID: 22540736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimization methods for virtual screening on novel computational architectures.
    Pérez-Sánchez H; Wenzel W
    Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2011 Mar; 7(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 20883205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retrieving novel C5aR antagonists using a hybrid ligand-based virtual screening protocol based on SVM classification and pharmacophore models.
    Qing XY; Zhang CH; Li LL; Ji P; Ma S; Wan HL; Wang ZR; Zou J; Yang SY
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2013; 31(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 22831459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Enhancements of screening collections to address areas of unmet medical need: an industry perspective.
    Drewry DH; Macarron R
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2010 Jun; 14(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 20413343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantum probability ranking principle for ligand-based virtual screening.
    Al-Dabbagh MM; Salim N; Himmat M; Ahmed A; Saeed F
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Apr; 31(4):365-378. PubMed ID: 28220440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of chemical libraries for their druggability.
    Sirois S; Hatzakis G; Wei D; Du Q; Chou KC
    Comput Biol Chem; 2005 Feb; 29(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 15680586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Receptor-based virtual screening protocol for drug discovery.
    Cerqueira NM; Gesto D; Oliveira EF; Santos-Martins D; Brás NF; Sousa SF; Fernandes PA; Ramos MJ
    Arch Biochem Biophys; 2015 Sep; 582():56-67. PubMed ID: 26045247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.