298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23330989)
1. Methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of prosthodontic-related systematic reviews.
Aziz T; Compton S; Nassar U; Matthews D; Ansari K; Flores-Mir C
J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Apr; 40(4):263-78. PubMed ID: 23330989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry.
Faggion CM; Atieh MA; Park S
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):883-8. PubMed ID: 23834263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic reviews supporting practice guideline recommendations lack protection against bias.
Brito JP; Tsapas A; Griebeler ML; Wang Z; Prutsky GJ; Domecq JP; Murad MH; Montori VM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 66(6):633-8. PubMed ID: 23510557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics.
Papageorgiou SN; Papadopoulos MA; Athanasiou AE
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Aug; 14(3):116-37. PubMed ID: 21771267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methodological quality assessment of paper-based systematic reviews published in oral health.
Wasiak J; Shen AY; Tan HB; Mahar R; Kan G; Khoo WR; Faggion CM
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Apr; 20(3):399-431. PubMed ID: 26589200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survey of the reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in rehabilitation.
Gianola S; Gasparini M; Agostini M; Castellini G; Corbetta D; Gozzer P; Li LC; Sirtori V; Taricco M; Tetzlaff JM; Turolla A; Moher D; Moja L
Phys Ther; 2013 Nov; 93(11):1456-66. PubMed ID: 23744458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination.
Remschmidt C; Wichmann O; Harder T
Vaccine; 2014 Mar; 32(15):1678-84. PubMed ID: 24513008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.
Moher D; Tetzlaff J; Tricco AC; Sampson M; Altman DG
PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e78. PubMed ID: 17388659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of methodological tools for assessing the quality of studies in periodontology and implant dentistry: a systematic review.
Faggion CM; Huda F; Wasiak J
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):625-31. PubMed ID: 24666018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
Shea B; Boers M; Grimshaw JM; Hamel C; Bouter LM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jun; 6():27. PubMed ID: 16772030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Overview of Systematic Reviews Related to Aspects of the Shortened Dental Arch and Its Variants in Adults.
Khan SB; Chikte UM; Omar R
Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(4):357-366. PubMed ID: 28697206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.
Goldkuhle M; Narayan VM; Weigl A; Dahm P; Skoetz N
BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020869. PubMed ID: 29581210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR.
Wu X; Sun H; Zhou X; Wang J; Li J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):30. PubMed ID: 29548276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Epidemiology, methodological and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of nursing interventions published in China.
Shi C; Zhu L; Wang X; Qin C; Xu Q; Tian J
Int J Nurs Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):689-700. PubMed ID: 25532885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A flood tide of systematic reviews on endodontic posts: methodological assessment using of R-AMSTAR.
Schmitter M; Sterzenbach G; Faggion CM; Krastl G
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jun; 17(5):1287-94. PubMed ID: 23436119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of acupuncture interventions published in Chinese journals.
Ma B; Qi GQ; Lin XT; Wang T; Chen ZM; Yang KH
J Altern Complement Med; 2012 Sep; 18(9):813-7. PubMed ID: 22924413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Critical appraisal of systematic reviews on the effect of a history of periodontitis on dental implant loss.
Faggion CM; Giannakopoulos NN
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 May; 40(5):542-52. PubMed ID: 23557434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
