These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23331550)

  • 1. Global and regional left ventricular myocardial deformation measures by magnetic resonance feature tracking in healthy volunteers: comparison with tagging and relevance of gender.
    Augustine D; Lewandowski AJ; Lazdam M; Rai A; Francis J; Myerson S; Noble A; Becher H; Neubauer S; Petersen SE; Leeson P
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2013 Jan; 15(1):8. PubMed ID: 23331550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of both DENSE and feature tracking techniques with tagging for the cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of myocardial strain.
    Cao JJ; Ngai N; Duncanson L; Cheng J; Gliganic K; Chen Q
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Apr; 20(1):26. PubMed ID: 29669563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of biventricular myocardial function using cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking, endocardial border delineation and echocardiographic speckle tracking in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot and healthy controls.
    Kempny A; Fernández-Jiménez R; Orwat S; Schuler P; Bunck AC; Maintz D; Baumgartner H; Diller GP
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 May; 14(1):32. PubMed ID: 22650308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reference ranges for three-dimensional feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance: comparison with two-dimensional methodology and relevance of age and gender.
    Liu B; Dardeer AM; Moody WE; Hayer MK; Baig S; Price AM; Leyva F; Edwards NC; Steeds RP
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 34(5):761-775. PubMed ID: 29181827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age- and gender-related normal left ventricular deformation assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking.
    Andre F; Steen H; Matheis P; Westkott M; Breuninger K; Sander Y; Kammerer R; Galuschky C; Giannitsis E; Korosoglou G; Katus HA; Buss SJ
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Mar; 17(1):25. PubMed ID: 25890093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of myocardial tagging and feature tracking in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
    Schneeweis C; Lapinskas T; Schnackenburg B; Berger A; Hucko T; Kelle S; Fleck E; Gebker R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Jul; 23(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 25803969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking using a non-rigid, elastic image registration algorithm: assessment of variability in a real-life clinical setting.
    Morais P; Marchi A; Bogaert JA; Dresselaers T; Heyde B; D'hooge J; Bogaert J
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Feb; 19(1):24. PubMed ID: 28209163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The intra-observer reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking strain assessment is independent of field strength.
    Schuster A; Morton G; Hussain ST; Jogiya R; Kutty S; Asrress KN; Makowski MR; Bigalke B; Perera D; Beerbaum P; Nagel E
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):296-301. PubMed ID: 23246014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking detects quantitative wall motion during dobutamine stress.
    Schuster A; Kutty S; Padiyath A; Parish V; Gribben P; Danford DA; Makowski MR; Bigalke B; Beerbaum P; Nagel E
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Oct; 13(1):58. PubMed ID: 21992220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multivendor comparison of global and regional 2D cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking strains vs tissue tagging at 3T.
    Militaru S; Panovsky R; Hanet V; Amzulescu MS; Langet H; Pisciotti MM; Pouleur AC; Vanoverschelde JJ; Gerber BL
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 May; 23(1):54. PubMed ID: 33980259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feature tracking CMR reveals abnormal strain in preclinical arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/ cardiomyopathy: a multisoftware feasibility and clinical implementation study.
    Bourfiss M; Vigneault DM; Aliyari Ghasebeh M; Murray B; James CA; Tichnell C; Mohamed Hoesein FA; Zimmerman SL; Kamel IR; Calkins H; Tandri H; Velthuis BK; Bluemke DA; Te Riele ASJM
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Sep; 19(1):66. PubMed ID: 28863780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification of left atrial strain and strain rate using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance myocardial feature tracking: a feasibility study.
    Kowallick JT; Kutty S; Edelmann F; Chiribiri A; Villa A; Steinmetz M; Sohns JM; Staab W; Bettencourt N; Unterberg-Buchwald C; Hasenfuß G; Lotz J; Schuster A
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Aug; 16(1):60. PubMed ID: 25196447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feature tracking compared with tissue tagging measurements of segmental strain by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Wu L; Germans T; Güçlü A; Heymans MW; Allaart CP; van Rossum AC
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Jan; 16(1):10. PubMed ID: 24450803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking.
    Morton G; Schuster A; Jogiya R; Kutty S; Beerbaum P; Nagel E
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Jun; 14(1):43. PubMed ID: 22721175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of left ventricular strains and torsion derived from feature tracking and DENSE CMR.
    Wehner GJ; Jing L; Haggerty CM; Suever JD; Chen J; Hamlet SM; Feindt JA; Dimitri Mojsejenko W; Fogel MA; Fornwalt BK
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Sep; 20(1):63. PubMed ID: 30208894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved segmental myocardial strain reproducibility using deformable registration algorithms compared with feature tracking cardiac MRI and speckle tracking echocardiography.
    Wang J; Li W; Sun J; Liu H; Kang Y; Yang D; Yu L; Greiser A; Zhou X; Han Y; Chen Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Aug; 48(2):404-414. PubMed ID: 29283466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantification of myocardial strain assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking in healthy subjects-influence of segmentation and analysis software.
    Lim C; Blaszczyk E; Riazy L; Wiesemann S; Schüler J; von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Schulz-Menger J
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jun; 31(6):3962-3972. PubMed ID: 33277669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Reference Values for Left Ventricular Myocardial Strains Measured by Feature-tracking Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Chinese Han Population].
    Liu H; Yang D; Luo Y; Wan K; Wang SM; Zhang TJ; Li WH; Zhang Q; Chen YC; Sun JY
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Jul; 47(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 28591970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of global and regional magnetic resonance feature tracking derived strain parameters of the left and right ventricle.
    Schmidt B; Dick A; Treutlein M; Schiller P; Bunck AC; Maintz D; Baeßler B
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():97-105. PubMed ID: 28267556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of myocardial deformation in children by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking: determination of reference values for left ventricular strain and strain rate.
    André F; Robbers-Visser D; Helling-Bakki A; Föll A; Voss A; Katus HA; Helbing WA; Buss SJ; Eichhorn JG
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Dec; 19(1):8. PubMed ID: 28103933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.