149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23331574)
1. Sample preparations are important for fluorescence in situ hybridization of cells biopsied from preimplantation embryos.
Li L; Zhang X; Wang W
Zygote; 2014 Aug; 22(3):300-4. PubMed ID: 23331574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis is likely to improve the clinical outcome for translocation carriers.
Tan YQ; Tan K; Zhang SP; Gong F; Cheng DH; Xiong B; Lu CF; Tang XC; Luo KL; Lin G; Lu GX
Hum Reprod; 2013 Sep; 28(9):2581-92. PubMed ID: 23847111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal timing for blastomere biopsy of 8-cell embryos for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
Kalma Y; Bar-El L; Asaf-Tisser S; Malcov M; Reches A; Hasson J; Amir H; Azem F; Ben-Yosef D
Hum Reprod; 2018 Jan; 33(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 29165686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A systematic analysis of the suitability of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for mitochondrial diseases in a heteroplasmic mitochondrial mouse model.
Neupane J; Vandewoestyne M; Heindryckx B; Ghimire S; Lu Y; Qian C; Lierman S; Van Coster R; Gerris J; Deroo T; Deforce D; De Sutter P
Hum Reprod; 2014 Apr; 29(4):852-9. PubMed ID: 24524987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Number of embryos biopsied as a predictive indicator for the outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis by fluorescence in situ hybridisation in translocation cases.
Tulay P; Gultomruk M; Findikli N; Bahceci M
Zygote; 2016 Feb; 24(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 25601127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis on polar bodies, blastomeres and trophoblast: insights into female meiotic errors and chromosomal segregation in the preimplantation window of embryo development.
Capalbo A; Bono S; Spizzichino L; Biricik A; Baldi M; Colamaria S; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L; Fiorentino F
Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):509-18. PubMed ID: 23148203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic diagnosis using polymerase chain reaction and fluorescent in-situ hybridization analysis of biopsied cells from both the cleavage and blastocyst stages of individual cultured human preimplantation embryos.
Muggleton-Harris AL; Glazier AM; Pickering S; Wall M
Hum Reprod; 1995 Jan; 10(1):183-92. PubMed ID: 7745052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization to human preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
Yan LY; Qiao J; Chen Y; Huang J; Liu P; Sun QY
Fertil Steril; 2009 Oct; 92(4):1492-1495. PubMed ID: 18990382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pregnancies and live births after trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing of human blastocysts.
McArthur SJ; Leigh D; Marshall JT; de Boer KA; Jansen RP
Fertil Steril; 2005 Dec; 84(6):1628-36. PubMed ID: 16359956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The analysis of one or two blastomeres for PGD using fluorescence in-situ hybridization.
Michiels A; Van Assche E; Liebaers I; Van Steirteghem A; Staessen C
Hum Reprod; 2006 Sep; 21(9):2396-402. PubMed ID: 16775157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human embryonic development after blastomere removal: a time-lapse analysis.
Kirkegaard K; Hindkjaer JJ; Ingerslev HJ
Hum Reprod; 2012 Jan; 27(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 22081251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis at 20 years.
Simpson JL
Prenat Diagn; 2010 Jul; 30(7):682-95. PubMed ID: 20572111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
Goossens V; De Rycke M; De Vos A; Staessen C; Michiels A; Verpoest W; Van Steirteghem A; Bertrand C; Liebaers I; Devroey P; Sermon K
Hum Reprod; 2008 Mar; 23(3):481-92. PubMed ID: 18156649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FISH for pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.
Scriven PN; Ogilvie CM
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 659():269-82. PubMed ID: 20809319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The value of blastocyst culture on preimplantation genetic diagnosis].
Ou J; Wang W; Ma Y; Zhou Z; Ding J; Wang F; Duan C; Li L; Zheng A; Chong W; Choy R; Li H
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Jun; 32(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 26037339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preimplantation diagnosis by fluorescence in situ hybridization using 13-, 16-, 18-, 21-, 22-, X-, and Y-chromosome probes.
Sasabe Y; Katayama KP; Nishimura T; Takahashi A; Asakura H; Winchester-Peden K; Wise L; Abe Y; Kubo H; Hirakawa S
J Assist Reprod Genet; 1999 Feb; 16(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 10079412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical experience of sex determination by fluorescent in-situ hybridization for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
Staessen C; Van Assche E; Joris H; Bonduelle M; Vandervorst M; Liebaers I; Van Steirteghem A
Mol Hum Reprod; 1999 Apr; 5(4):382-9. PubMed ID: 10321812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the validity of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for embryo chromosomal anomalies by fluorescence in situ hybridization on one or two blastomeres.
Emiliani S; Gonzalez-Merino E; Englert Y; Abramowicz M
Genet Test; 2004; 8(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 15140376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fluorescence in situ hybridization reanalysis of day-6 human blastocysts diagnosed with aneuploidy on day 3.
Li M; DeUgarte CM; Surrey M; Danzer H; DeCherney A; Hill DL
Fertil Steril; 2005 Nov; 84(5):1395-400. PubMed ID: 16275234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility study of repeated fluorescent in-situ hybridization in the same human blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
Liu J; Tsai YL; Zheng XZ; Yazigi RA; Baramki TA; Compton G; Katz E
Mol Hum Reprod; 1998 Oct; 4(10):972-7. PubMed ID: 9809679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
