228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23331643)
1. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of image cytometric DNA ploidy measurement in cytological samples of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Demirel D; Akyürek N; Ramzy I
Cytopathology; 2013 Apr; 24(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 23331643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Nasser SM; Cibas ES; Crum CP; Faquin WC
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 14579293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical importance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H)" terminology for cervical smears 5-year analysis of the positive predictive value of LSIL-H compared with ASC-H, LSIL, and HSIL in the detection of high-grade cervical lesions with a review of the literature.
Ince U; Aydin O; Peker O
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Apr; 121(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 21211831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in the management of women with abnormal Pap smears. Experience of a colposcopy referral clinic.
Ciotti M; Sesti F; Paba P; Benedetto A; Patrizi L; Criscuolo A; Piccione E; Branca M; Syrjänen K; Favalli C
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2004; 25(5):577-84. PubMed ID: 15493169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DNA cytometry confirms the utility of the Bethesda system for the classification of Papanicolaou smears.
Bollmann R; Bollmann M; Henson DE; Bodo M
Cancer; 2001 Jun; 93(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 11391611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence for increasing usage of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H) Pap test interpretations.
Walavalkar V; Tommet D; Fischer AH; Liu Y; Papa DM; Owens CL
Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Feb; 122(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 23983192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is the low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion category associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2?
Cetiner H; Kır G; Kaygusuz E; Sağlıcan Y; Kabaca C
Acta Cytol; 2013; 57(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 24107612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applicability of liquid-based cytology to the assessment of DNA content in cervical lesions using static cytometry.
Shirata NK; Longatto Filho A; Roteli-Martins C; Espoladore LM; Pittoli JE; Syrjänen K
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2003 Aug; 25(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 12961827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on Papanicolaou test: follow-up rates and stratification of risk for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Rufail M; Lew M; Pang J; Jing X; Heider A; Cantley RL
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(4):258-265. PubMed ID: 32402830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The significance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" as a distinct squamous abnormality category in Papanicolaou tests.
Elsheikh TM; Kirkpatrick JL; Wu HH
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 16937376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative methylation-specific PCR for the detection of aberrant DNA methylation in liquid-based Pap tests.
Kahn SL; Ronnett BM; Gravitt PE; Gustafson KS
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 114(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18181097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [DNA-cytometry in dysplasias of the uterine cervix].
Bollmann R
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Apr; 123(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 11370528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot rule out high-grade lesion: Diagnosis, histological outcomes and human papillomavirus results.
Segura SE; Ramos-Rivera G; Hakima L; Suhrland M; Khader S
Cytopathology; 2019 Jan; 30(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 30187975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions.
Arbyn M; Roelens J; Simoens C; Buntinx F; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch PP; Prendiville WJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; 2013(3):CD008054. PubMed ID: 23543559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of p16(INK4a) cytology testing as an adjunct to enhance the diagnostic specificity and accuracy in human papillomavirus-positive women within an organized cervical cancer screening program.
Gustinucci D; Passamonti B; Cesarini E; Butera D; Palmieri EA; Bulletti S; Carlani A; Staiano M; D'Amico MR; D'Angelo V; Di Dato E; Martinelli N; Malaspina M; Spita N; Tintori B; Fulciniti F
Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(5):506-14. PubMed ID: 23075891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An automated quantitative DNA image cytometry system detects abnormal cells in cervical cytology with high sensitivity.
Wong OG; Ho MW; Tsun OK; Ng AK; Tsui EY; Chow JN; Ip PP; Cheung AN
Cytopathology; 2018 Jun; 29(3):267-274. PubMed ID: 29578257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association between micronucleus frequency and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade in Thinprep cytological test and its significance.
Shi YH; Wang BW; Tuokan T; Li QZ; Zhang YJ
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2015; 8(7):8426-32. PubMed ID: 26339413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distribution of human papillomavirus types in ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests classified according to the Bethesda 2001 terminology and correlations with patient age and biopsy outcomes.
Evans MF; Adamson CS; Papillo JL; St John TL; Leiman G; Cooper K
Cancer; 2006 Mar; 106(5):1054-64. PubMed ID: 16421920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) lesions by DNA image cytometry].
Sun XR; Che DY; Tu HZ; Li D; Wang J
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2006 Nov; 28(11):831-5. PubMed ID: 17416004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.
Shain AF; Kwok S; Folkins AK; Kong CS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
