179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23332390)
1. Centroid method: an alternative method of determining coronal curvature in scoliosis. A comparative study versus Cobb method in the degenerative spine.
Hong JY; Suh SW; Modi HN; Lee JM; Park SY
Spine J; 2013 Apr; 13(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 23332390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Centroid method: reliable method to determine the coronal curvature of scoliosis: a case control study comparing with the Cobb method.
Hong JY; Suh SW; Modi HN; Hur CY; Song HR; Ryu JH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):E855-61. PubMed ID: 21289563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative analysis of 4 curvature measurement methods in early-onset scoliosis.
Hwang JH; Hong JY; Suh SW; Yang JH; Lee JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(20):E1273-81. PubMed ID: 22739673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of Coronal Curvature Measures in Premature Scoliosis: Comparison of 4 Methods Using Inverted Digital Luminescence Radiography.
Hong JY; Hwang JH; Suh SW; Yang JH; Kim JR; Bae YG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jun; 40(12):E701-12. PubMed ID: 25768689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Reliabilities of Radiographic Measurements of Cervical Sagittal Alignment in Ankylosing Spondylitis.
Shin JK; Lee JS; Kang SS; Lee JM; Youn BH
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Jul; 29(6):E282-7. PubMed ID: 25137147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intra- and Interrater Reliability of Cobb Angle Measurements on the Plane of Maximum Curvature Using Ultrasound Imaging Method.
Trac S; Zheng R; Hill DL; Lou E
Spine Deform; 2019 Jan; 7(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 30587314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability analysis for radiographic measures of lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis: a case-control study comparing 6 methods.
Hong JY; Suh SW; Modi HN; Hur CY; Song HR; Park JH
Eur Spine J; 2010 Sep; 19(9):1551-7. PubMed ID: 20437183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis.
Qiao J; Liu Z; Xu L; Wu T; Zheng X; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Qian B; Qiu Y
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):E88-92. PubMed ID: 22237178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiographic measurement reliability of lumbar lordosis in ankylosing spondylitis.
Lee JS; Goh TS; Park SH; Lee HS; Suh KT
Eur Spine J; 2013 Apr; 22(4):813-8. PubMed ID: 23179978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured.
Richards BS; Sucato DJ; Konigsberg DE; Ouellet JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1148-56; discussion 1156-7. PubMed ID: 12782983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of lumbar lordosis measurement in patients with spondylolisthesis: a case-control study comparing the Cobb, centroid, and posterior tangent methods.
Hwang JH; Modi HN; Suh SW; Hong JY; Park YH; Park JH; Yang JH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Aug; 35(18):1691-700. PubMed ID: 20543767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability analysis of Cobb measurement in degenerative lumbar scoliosis using endplate versus pedicle as bony landmarks.
Guo J; Deng XC; Ling QJ; Yin ZX; He EX
Postgrad Med; 2017 Sep; 129(7):762-767. PubMed ID: 28627954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability analysis of shoulder balance measures: comparison of the 4 available methods.
Hong JY; Suh SW; Yang JH; Park SY; Han JH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):E1684-90. PubMed ID: 23804158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A reliability and validity study for different coronal angles using ultrasound imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Brink RC; Wijdicks SPJ; Tromp IN; Schlösser TPC; Kruyt MC; Beek FJA; Castelein RM
Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):979-985. PubMed ID: 29056566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and reliability of coronal and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system.
Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1052-9. PubMed ID: 23102842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring scoliosis curvature.
He JW; Yan ZH; Liu J; Yu ZK; Wang XY; Bai GH; Ye XJ; Zhang X
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):E323-9. PubMed ID: 19531987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Mok JM; Berven SH; Diab M; Hackbarth M; Hu SS; Deviren V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 18344863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of a new method for measuring coronal trunk imbalance, the axis-line-angle technique.
Zhang RF; Liu K; Wang X; Liu Q; He JW; Wang XY; Yan ZH
Spine J; 2015 Dec; 15(12):2459-65. PubMed ID: 26291401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods.
Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Cailliet R; Janik TJ; Holland B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jun; 26(11):E235-42. PubMed ID: 11389407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
