101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23332656)
1. Post-conization endocervical curettage for estimating the risk of persistent or recurrent high-grade dysplasia.
Shaco-Levy R; Meirovitz M; Eger G; Benharroch D; Dreiher J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 121(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 23332656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Positive margin status in uterine cervix cone specimens is associated with persistent/recurrent high-grade dysplasia.
Shaco-Levy R; Eger G; Dreiher J; Benharroch D; Meirovitz M
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2014 Jan; 33(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 24300540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinicopathologic variables predictive of residual dysplasia after cervical conization.
Schermerhorn TJ; Hodge J; Saltzman AK; Hackett TE; Sprance HE; Harrison TA
J Reprod Med; 1997 Apr; 42(4):189-92. PubMed ID: 9131490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive value of endocervical curettage at cervical conization and provider practices in management of high-grade cervical dysplasia.
Barlin JN; Bristow RE; Murillo AM; Zahurak M; Veras E; Salani R
J Reprod Med; 2010; 55(3-4):129-33. PubMed ID: 20506673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The value of endocervical curettage during loop electrosurgical excision procedures in predicting persistent/recurrent preinvasive cervical disease.
Cuello MA; Espinosa ME; Orlandini EJ; Hwang DY
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Jun; 141(3):337-343. PubMed ID: 29509961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting persistent/recurrent disease in the cervix after excisional biopsy.
Ramchandani SM; Houck KL; Hernandez E; Gaughan JP
MedGenMed; 2007 Apr; 9(2):24. PubMed ID: 17955080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies.
Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Duggan BD; Roman LD
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 84(6):996-1000. PubMed ID: 7970484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of endocervical curettage at cervical conization for high-grade dysplasia.
Kobak WH; Roman LD; Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Schlaerth JB; Morrow CP
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Feb; 85(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 7824230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endocervical curettage at conization to predict residual cervical adenocarcinoma in situ.
Lea JS; Shin CH; Sheets EE; Coleman RL; Gehrig PA; Duska LR; Miller DS; Schorge JO
Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Oct; 87(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 12468353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of recurrent/residual disease after loop electrosurgical excisional procedure.
Chikazawa K; Netsu S; Motomatsu S; Konno R
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Apr; 42(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 26786387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The efficacy of cervical conization in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-positive women.
Holcomb K; Matthews RP; Chapman JE; Abulafia O; Lee YC; Borges A; Buhl A
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Sep; 74(3):428-31. PubMed ID: 10479504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of endocervical curettage with conization in diagnosis of endocervical lesions.
Suzuki Y; Cho T; Mogami T; Yokota NR; Matsunaga T; Asai-Sato M; Hirahara F; Nojima M; Mori M; Miyagi E
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2017 Apr; 43(4):723-728. PubMed ID: 28168772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What is the value of pre-surgical variables in addition to cone dimensions in predicting cone margin status?
Giannella L; Di Giuseppe J; Prandi S; Delli Carpini G; Tsiroglou D; Ciavattini A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():180-184. PubMed ID: 31812841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recurrence of dysplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedures with long-term follow-up.
Gonzalez DI; Zahn CM; Retzloff MG; Moore WF; Kost ER; Snyder RR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Feb; 184(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 11228480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of endocervical curettage in follow-up for patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia stage 2+ after loop electrosurgical excision.
Cao D; Shen K; Chen Y; Xu Y; Wu D
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Sep; 158(3):584-589. PubMed ID: 32586604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization.
Lapaquette TK; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Doherty MG; Yandell RB; Buchanan VS
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):440-3. PubMed ID: 8355949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of Persistent or Recurrent Disease After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure.
Cejtin HE; Zimmerman L; Mathews M; Patel A
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Jan; 21(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 27824789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical conization of adenocarcinoma in situ: a predicting model of residual disease.
Tierney KE; Lin PS; Amezcua C; Matsuo K; Ye W; Felix JC; Roman LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 210(4):366.e1-366.e5. PubMed ID: 24370689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
