BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23334123)

  • 1. Impact of time-of-flight and point-spread-function in SUV quantification for oncological PET.
    Prieto E; Domínguez-Prado I; García-Velloso MJ; Peñuelas I; Richter JÁ; Martí-Climent JM
    Clin Nucl Med; 2013 Feb; 38(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 23334123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
    Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
    J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of point spread function reconstruction on quantitative 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging parameters and inter-reader reproducibility in solid tumors.
    Sheikhbahaei S; Marcus C; Wray R; Rahmim A; Lodge MA; Subramaniam RM
    Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Mar; 37(3):288-96. PubMed ID: 26650959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving the detection of small lesions using a state-of-the-art time-of-flight PET/CT system and small-voxel reconstructions.
    Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Lagerweij MC; Arkies H; de Boer J; Oostdijk AH; Slump CH; Jager PL
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Mar; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25613334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of strategies towards harmonization of FDG PET/CT studies in multicentre trials: comparison of scanner validation phantoms and data analysis procedures.
    Makris NE; Huisman MC; Kinahan PE; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Oct; 40(10):1507-15. PubMed ID: 23754762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Harmonization of Standardized Uptake Value among Different Generation PET/ CT Cameras Based on a Phantom Experiment -Utility of SUV(peak)].
    Akamatsu G; Nishida H; Fujino A; Ohnishi A; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Maebatake A; Sasaki M; Senda M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Sep; 71(9):735-45. PubMed ID: 26400557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690.
    Bettinardi V; Presotto L; Rapisarda E; Picchio M; Gianolli L; Gilardi MC
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5394-411. PubMed ID: 21992359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is the standard uptake value (SUV) appropriate for quantification in clinical PET imaging? - Variability induced by different SUV measurements and varying reconstruction methods.
    Brendle C; Kupferschläger J; Nikolaou K; la Fougère C; Gatidis S; Pfannenberg C
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):158-162. PubMed ID: 25467224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating the limits of PET/CT imaging at very low true count rates and high random fractions in ion-beam therapy monitoring.
    Kurz C; Bauer J; Conti M; Guérin L; Eriksson L; Parodi K
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3979-91. PubMed ID: 26133598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification errors in MR imaging-based attenuation correction.
    Mehranian A; Zaidi H
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 56(4):635-41. PubMed ID: 25745090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of Point-Spread Function Modeling on PET Image Quality in Integrated PET/MR Hybrid Imaging.
    Aklan B; Oehmigen M; Beiderwellen K; Ruhlmann M; Paulus DH; Jakoby BW; Ritt P; Quick HH
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 57(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 26471697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of different signal-to-background ratios on spatial resolution and F18-FDG-PET quantification using point spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction.
    Rogasch JM; Hofheinz F; Lougovski A; Furth C; Ruf J; Großer OS; Mohnike K; Hass P; Walke M; Amthauer H; Steffen IG
    EJNMMI Phys; 2014 Dec; 1(1):12. PubMed ID: 26501454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to harmonize SUVs obtained by hybrid PET/CT scanners with and without point spread function correction.
    Ferretti A; Chondrogiannis S; Rampin L; Bellan E; Marzola MC; Grassetto G; Gusella S; Maffione AM; Gava M; Rubello D
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235010. PubMed ID: 30474620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of whole-body oncologic PET with time-of-flight and point-spread function for the hybrid PET/MR system.
    Shang K; Cui B; Ma J; Shuai D; Liang Z; Jansen F; Zhou Y; Lu J; Zhao G
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():70-75. PubMed ID: 28668434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influences of point-spread function and time-of-flight reconstructions on standardized uptake value of lymph node metastases in FDG-PET.
    Akamatsu G; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Tsutsui Y; Baba S; Sasaki M
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):226-30. PubMed ID: 24144448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography.
    Black QC; Grills IS; Kestin LL; Wong CY; Wong JW; Martinez AA; Yan D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1272-82. PubMed ID: 15519800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SUV Harmonization Between Different Hybrid PET/CT Systems.
    Rubello D; Colletti PM
    Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 43(11):811-814. PubMed ID: 30199381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    Lasnon C; Majdoub M; Lavigne B; Do P; Madelaine J; Visvikis D; Hatt M; Aide N
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Dec; 43(13):2324-2335. PubMed ID: 27325312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Harmonizing SUVs in multicentre trials when using different generation PET systems: prospective validation in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
    Lasnon C; Desmonts C; Quak E; Gervais R; Do P; Dubos-Arvis C; Aide N
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Jul; 40(7):985-96. PubMed ID: 23564036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation of simultaneously acquired diffusion-weighted imaging and 2-deoxy-[18F] fluoro-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography of pulmonary lesions in a dedicated whole-body magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography system.
    Schmidt H; Brendle C; Schraml C; Martirosian P; Bezrukov I; Hetzel J; Müller M; Sauter A; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer NF
    Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 23519008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.