BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23334356)

  • 1. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal and spectral cues for musical timbre perception in electric hearing.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J; Epstein M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):981-94. PubMed ID: 21060140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.
    Arehart KH; Croghan NB; Muralimanohar RK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 24441739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users.
    Heng J; Cantarero G; Elhilali M; Limb CJ
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):192-200. PubMed ID: 21664263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in Perception of Musical Stimuli among Acoustic, Electric, and Combined Modality Listeners.
    Prentiss SM; Friedland DR; Nash JJ; Runge CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):494-501. PubMed ID: 26055838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mismatch negativity (MMN) objectively reflects timbre discrimination thresholds in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Rahne T; Plontke SK; Wagner L
    Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 1586():143-51. PubMed ID: 25152464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examination of spectral timbre cues and musical instrument identification in cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Lang-Roth R; Streicher B; Walger M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Mar; 15(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 24597635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of the adaptive music perception test.
    Kirchberger MJ; Russo FA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 25350404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Timbre discrimination in cochlear implant users and normal hearing subjects using cross-faded synthetic tones.
    Rahne T; Böhme L; Götze G
    J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Aug; 199(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 21664377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Kong YY; Cruz R; Jones JA; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 15064662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pitch ranking of complex tones by normally hearing subjects and cochlear implant users.
    Sucher CM; McDermott HJ
    Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 230(1-2):80-7. PubMed ID: 17604582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant.
    Cousineau M; Demany L; Meyer B; Pressnitzer D
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):34-41. PubMed ID: 20674733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability.
    Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Memory Span for Spoken Digits in Adults With Cochlear Implants or Typical Hearing: Effects of Age and Identification Ability.
    Cleary M; Wilkinson T; Wilson L; Goupell MJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 61(8):2099-2114. PubMed ID: 30073267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From fragments to the whole: a comparison between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners in music perception and enjoyment.
    Alexander AJ; Bartel L; Friesen L; Shipp D; Chen J
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 21303594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a Test Battery to Assess Perception of Music in Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Roy AT; Scattergood-Keepper L; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Butler C; Limb CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jun; 140(6):540-7. PubMed ID: 24722833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening.
    Wright R; Uchanski RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):350-65; quiz 379. PubMed ID: 22533978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic correlates of timbre space dimensions: a confirmatory study using synthetic tones.
    Caclin A; McAdams S; Smith BK; Winsberg S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jul; 118(1):471-82. PubMed ID: 16119366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 63.