These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23335017)

  • 1. APoc: large-scale identification of similar protein pockets.
    Gao M; Skolnick J
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 29(5):597-604. PubMed ID: 23335017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction.
    Hoffmann B; Zaslavskiy M; Vert JP; Stoven V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():99. PubMed ID: 20175916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative assessment of strategies to identify similar ligand-binding pockets in proteins.
    Govindaraj RG; Brylinski M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 19(1):91. PubMed ID: 29523085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visualisation of variable binding pockets on protein surfaces by probabilistic analysis of related structure sets.
    Ashford P; Moss DS; Alex A; Yeap SK; Povia A; Nobeli I; Williams MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13():39. PubMed ID: 22417279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comprehensive survey of small-molecule binding pockets in proteins.
    Gao M; Skolnick J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013 Oct; 9(10):e1003302. PubMed ID: 24204237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. LIGSIFT: an open-source tool for ligand structural alignment and virtual screening.
    Roy A; Skolnick J
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 31(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 25336501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting allosteric pockets in protein biological assemblages.
    Kumar A; Kaynak BT; Dorman KS; Doruker P; Jernigan RL
    Bioinformatics; 2023 May; 39(5):. PubMed ID: 37115636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Large-scale binding ligand prediction by improved patch-based method Patch-Surfer2.0.
    Zhu X; Xiong Y; Kihara D
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 31(5):707-13. PubMed ID: 25359888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. iAlign: a method for the structural comparison of protein-protein interfaces.
    Gao M; Skolnick J
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Sep; 26(18):2259-65. PubMed ID: 20624782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design.
    Liang J; Edelsbrunner H; Woodward C
    Protein Sci; 1998 Sep; 7(9):1884-97. PubMed ID: 9761470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fpocket: an open source platform for ligand pocket detection.
    Le Guilloux V; Schmidtke P; Tuffery P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jun; 10():168. PubMed ID: 19486540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The distribution of ligand-binding pockets around protein-protein interfaces suggests a general mechanism for pocket formation.
    Gao M; Skolnick J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Mar; 109(10):3784-9. PubMed ID: 22355140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification and analysis of conserved pockets on protein surfaces.
    Cammisa M; Correra A; Andreotti G; Cubellis MV
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S9. PubMed ID: 23815589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comprehensive identification of "druggable" protein ligand binding sites.
    An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Genome Inform; 2004; 15(2):31-41. PubMed ID: 15706489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-organizing fuzzy graphs for structure-based comparison of protein pockets.
    Reisen F; Weisel M; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    J Proteome Res; 2010 Dec; 9(12):6498-510. PubMed ID: 20883038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting gene ontology functions from protein's regional surface structures.
    Liu ZP; Wu LY; Wang Y; Chen L; Zhang XS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 8():475. PubMed ID: 18070366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. fPOP: footprinting functional pockets of proteins by comparative spatial patterns.
    Tseng YY; Chen ZJ; Li WH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 Jan; 38(Database issue):D288-95. PubMed ID: 19880384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. aCSM: noise-free graph-based signatures to large-scale receptor-based ligand prediction.
    Pires DE; de Melo-Minardi RC; da Silveira CH; Campos FF; Meira W
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Apr; 29(7):855-61. PubMed ID: 23396119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MSPocket: an orientation-independent algorithm for the detection of ligand binding pockets.
    Zhu H; Pisabarro MT
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Feb; 27(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 21134896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of pockets on protein surfaces using small and large probe spheres to find putative ligand binding sites.
    Kawabata T; Go N
    Proteins; 2007 Aug; 68(2):516-29. PubMed ID: 17444522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.