These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
16. The expression pattern of CD10 and CD31 identifies fine fibrovascular stroma of grade 1-endometrial endometrioid carcinomas in cytology. Norimatsu Y; Nishikawa T; Suzuki H; Hosokawa S; Yano H; Maeda Y; Kurokawa T; Shinagawa A; Kobayashi TK; Fulciniti F Cytopathology; 2022 May; 33(3):362-373. PubMed ID: 34689374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morphological characteristics and co-stimulatory molecule (CD80, CD86, CD40) expression in tumor infiltrating dendritic cells in human endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Jia J; Wang Z; Li X; Wang Z; Wang X Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Feb; 160(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 22142817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative image analysis of conventional and thin-layer preparations in endometrial cytology. Hattori M; Kobayashi TK; Nishimura Y; Machida D; Toyonaga M; Tsunoda S; Ohbu M Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Jun; 41(6):527-32. PubMed ID: 22807421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphological Differences between Liquid-Based Cytology and Conventional Preparation in Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma Grade 1 and Grade 3, and the Differentiation of Grades in Each Method. Odashima H; Yoshioka H; Ota K; Goto Y; Noro M; Horie K; Watanabe J Acta Cytol; 2021; 65(3):227-234. PubMed ID: 33652432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The prognostic value of semiquantitative nuclear grading in endometrial carcinomas. Hachisuga T; Kawarabayashi T; Iwasaka T; Sugimori H; Kamura T; Tsuneyoshi M Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Apr; 65(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 9103400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]